NOW (!) Lynne and Dick are upset!!!

Written by
Published October 14, 2004

I am completely blown away by Mrs. VP Cheney and her accusation that John Kerry mentioning her lesbian daughter was over the line! Excuse me, but wasn't this subject already addressed? On national television? By the VP Nominee — John Edwards? Like over a week ago? I thought so. Just seeking some clarification before I go on a full out rant. Seems to me that would have been the appropriate time to become upset? Don't you agree?

Anyone that has been paying attention knows that Mary Cheney is a lesbian. It's in the national news! Has been for MONTHS! Why is this fact now out of bounds for discussion? Seems awfully convenient to call "foul" now. I suppose when the chips are down you have to create SPIN where ever you can?

Highlighting the point once again: It wasn't off limits in the VP debate. No one made a stink then!

As a GAY American, I have something to offer: I say welcome to the party!

In my experience, it is always fair in this country to discriminate against fags, dykes and the like. We are one of the most accepted groups to demonize. The fact that your husband would not stand up to his boss; and take issue with his policies to aid in the defense of your own daughter is shameful. It is grossly hypocritical. It is pathetic. Some might go as far as to say it is not very good parenting.

Now what I find even more pathetic is that you are conveniently willing to stand up at this late date and call "foul!" Not months ago. Not when the President attacked both my and your daughter's civil rights during his State of the Union. You have chosen to be silent until now.

Talk about politics!

You were offended! Give me a break!

My mother was offended by the fact that you and your husband wouldn't stand up to defend the rights of your daughter; to prove your love for your own flesh and blood.

My entire family was offended by the President when he launched a culture war on homosexuals. Actually he didn't start it, it was already smoldering. President Bush just threw some Napalm on the fire to get it really rolling. That offended me, my family, and many Americans.

Allow me to remind you, the question would never have been asked if President Bush hadn't sent up the alarm and made it a "national priority to defend the sanctity of marriage." If he wants to defend that, then he should be working to "bring people together" to make divorce illegal. I think that course of action speaks more clearly to the idea of "defending the sanctity of marriage."

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
NOW (!) Lynne and Dick are upset!!!
Published: October 14, 2004
Type:
Section: Politics
Writer:
's BC Writer page
's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by
All Politics Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — October 14, 2004 @ 18:52PM — Big Time Patriot [URL]

Ms. Cheney (the daughter) works for the campaign. To consider her a "private person" in this regard and not a "political person" is to apply the "soft bigotry of low expectations" (I love that phrase, it's such a fancy way of saying you think some one is getting dissed) to Ms. Cheney, perhaps because she is a gay woman?

#2 — October 14, 2004 @ 19:01PM — boomcrashbaby

When right winger Alan Keyes said that Mary Cheney practiced selfish hedonism, Lynne Cheney was silent, letting her other daughter speak instead.

When John Kerry makes a reference to Mary Cheney being just like any other American, THEN Lynne gets upset.

My heart goes out to Mary. Now I understand the relationship between her and her mother. Why she hasn't become a buzz-cut wearing, tattoo-covered, harley riding dyke is beyond me.

Shame on Lynne Cheney for speaking out against Kerry and not Alan Keyes, especially considering each of their statements, shame shame for using your own child as a political tool that way. But with Republicans also taking their toddlers to the front lines of rallies so they can be political tools as well, it makes me wonder why I'm fighting so hard to be a part of all this 'family value' crapola.

#3 — October 14, 2004 @ 19:23PM — Bob A. Booey [URL]

I think the Cheneys have no room to be indignant here. Clearly, Cheney was uncomfortable with the first mention in the VP debate with Edwards, and this second mention by Kerry (using the heavier term "lesbian") probably was the straw that broke the camel's back.

Two problems, though:
First, Cheney thanked Edwards for his comments about Mary. Yes, I do recognize that Edwards's mention was as much strategic as it was empathetic and perhaps his mention was made more palatable by his soft touch with words. Kerry followed almost the same playbook with the exact same words -- perhaps less positive affect and Southern charm. Cheney's thankful, emotional response to the first mention mutes all his anger about the second one.

Second, Cheney himself has avoided talking about the President's position on gay marriage and made it very clear it is the President's and not his.

Third, the more they talk about Kerry being a "bad man" for daring to say that their daughter is a lesbian, the more people remember that she is INDEED a lesbian, particularly social conservatives who might be less motivated to turn out and vote on religious values. It's a no-win situation politically and they'd be best advised to move on, no matter how insulted they feel.

You'd think they'd save some of that indignation for the President's anti-gay agenda.

That is all.

#4 — October 14, 2004 @ 20:49PM — jack e. jett [URL]

this thing really bothers me becuase the mom is sounding like she is ashamed of her daughter.

she is a lesbian, big deal. kerry and edwards brought it up. big deal.

hey...bigger issue......thousands of folks are being killed in iraq for no obvious reason.

jack e. jett

#5 — October 14, 2004 @ 22:33PM — Mac Diva [URL]

Exactly, Jack E. I suspect Rove and the Cheneys are just playing move the cheese. If people focus on their silly claim that saying an acknowledged lesbian working on the Bush/Cheney campaign is gay is 'bad,' they will not be focusing on Bush's third failure in the debates or other news damning to the powers that be.

#6 — October 14, 2004 @ 22:47PM — Shark

The great irony is that after all the relentless "character" attacks against Heinz-Kerry, Lynne Cheney comes off as a psycho bitch with the "This is a bad man. No, this is a BAD man..." bit.

So big deal: the daughter of the Right Wing de facto President of the 'Christian Family Values Party' is a Lesbian.

Did I mention she's a lesbian?

Gay?

A lesbian who eats pussy?

While gay?

hahahahahahahaha.



#7 — October 14, 2004 @ 22:49PM — Shark

THE GOOD NEWS:

According to the Christoids, she'll be able to meet her lying, criminal pop in Hell.


#8 — October 14, 2004 @ 22:51PM — Natalie Davis [URL]

Saw this and wanted to chime in from the comment I made on my blog, but trackback doesn't appear to be working. Here's a link.

#9 — October 15, 2004 @ 11:30AM — jack e. jett [URL]

this just in.

mary cheney is still gay.

and her parents thought it was just a phase. so did mine, 24 years ago, i think they have given up on that.

jack

#10 — October 15, 2004 @ 11:31AM — Eric Olsen

And Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead

#11 — October 18, 2004 @ 18:17PM — L. Goodman

It seems to me that this was a campaign trick concocted by Karl Rove.

Rove probably figured Cheney's daughter would be mentioned in the vice presidential debate, and he instructed Cheney to respond magnanimously.

Rove calculated that Kerry, seeing Cheney's response, would consider Mary an open topic for discussion.

Rove's brilliant strategy was to then instruct the Cheney's to express outrage at the mention of their daughter's sexual orientation by Kerry.

The strategy appears to have worked. Recent polls show Bush pulling ahead. Kerry mentioning a known fact will probably wind up costing him the election.

Karl Rove is brilliant.

#12 — October 18, 2004 @ 19:24PM — bob2112

Open season on Rove strategy! Polls my ass! Republican base polls that did not get an accurate segment of anything. Were did you see this poll, FOX News?

Rove is brilliantly evil! To say good things about Karl Rove tells me what kind of redneck creep world a person lives in. I suppose J.Edgar Hoover was a cool dude, Ann Coulter is a nice girl, & Civil Rights for minorites & women is a bad idea that should be done in!

A negative man(Mr.Rove) allowed in the realms of my tax dollars, but a welfare check, legal abortion, or embryonic stem cell research not okay?

I hope that the dirty trick mentioning Mary Cheney in the debate, wakes you 'Kool Aid' zombies up to your own negative campaign strategies that are backfiring on you as we speak!

Please, L.Goodman, let your post be some sarcasm to bait me, 'cause you sound sick.

#13 — October 18, 2004 @ 19:26PM — andy marsh

Ann Coulter is a nice girl!!! Come on Bob!!!

#14 — October 18, 2004 @ 20:10PM — andy marsh

I think their (the Cheneys) argument is that when Edwards did it, he was speaking directly to Cheney, that made it fair game. When Kerry did it, Cheney was not on stage and not part of the debate. It's sort of like being in a 'yo momma' fight and bringing in some other guys mom, that had nothing to do with it! Not fair!!!

#15 — October 18, 2004 @ 20:23PM — bob2112

I know it's not fair. I don't care that it's not fair. It's not fair that they keep saying that Kerry voted for the war! It's not fair to say he voted against supporting the troops.

Cheney slams on Kerry when he's not in the room all the time on worse issues than Mary Cheney is a lesbian! As much of an issue keeping gays from marriage the Republicans use to polarize voters, Kerry could have said, "You guys have a lesbian daughter. Do you want to take away her rights? Then shut up about a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, you hypocrites!"

Fair game, man!

#16 — October 18, 2004 @ 21:58PM — andy marsh

yeah...but cheney doesn't slam on Kerry's daughter...and I did like that dress she was wearing...wouldn't want one of my daughters in it, but hey, I'm not running for president. whatthe hell do I know?

#17 — October 18, 2004 @ 23:07PM — boomcrashbaby

Um, Andy, Kerry didn't slam on Cheney's daughter either.

#18 — October 19, 2004 @ 06:53AM — andy marsh

Did I say slam anywhere in my comment??? I didn't think so

#19 — October 19, 2004 @ 06:54AM — andy marsh

my mistake...yes I did say slam..guess it was a bad choice of words...I'll try to be more sensitive next time

#20 — October 19, 2004 @ 11:18AM — boomcrashbaby

not sensitive so much as accurate.

#21 — October 19, 2004 @ 20:33PM — bob2112

Andy, this is the current Democratic strategy, for the most part: Let opponent insert own foot in mouth!

You are a bigger man to catch & correct your mistakes than GOP party monsters.

#22 — October 19, 2004 @ 20:56PM — andy marsh

guess it's a good thing I wear tasty...or is that tasteful shoes???

#23 — October 19, 2004 @ 21:30PM — bob2112

The Karl Rove machine is claiming that what Kerry did was a 'slam' so you weren't off about what you said. At the same time, Kerry did not slam Mary Cheney.

In my opinion though, Kerry pulled a dirty move by going there & you could 'theorize' that he did it to get the Bush/Cheney camp to make fools of themselves in the face of their anti-gay stance. The person suggesting that ingenious Rovisms are at work should think about how obvious his work is & how it is backfiring.

Like I was saying about the cocaine; the addict is not at fault when it is considered a sickness. Ask yourself, are those gang members bringing all that dope into this country?

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/20997)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments