<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2004 00:53:02 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by RJ on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/12/111028.php#comment-92682</link>
<description>[unsheathes two-handed battle axe]

&quot;How many hit points does the gully dwarf have left?&quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">92682@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2004 00:53:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Al Barger on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/12/111028.php#comment-92672</link>
<description>The dark woman, she is too wise and her soul too strong for us.  She knows too much.  She must be eliminated.

Mike Kole and RJ, my minions, you must dispatch this Fighter for Justice with extreme prejudice before she exposes our plans for World Domination.

Go, now!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">92672@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2004 22:55:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by bob2112 on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/12/111028.php#comment-92653</link>
<description>It&#039;s OK, Diva. I can take it. I&#039;ve been left out in these NW woods for the last 24 of my 35 years!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">92653@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2004 20:45:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mike Kole on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/12/111028.php#comment-92434</link>
<description>Diva, that was really unseemly of you to describe my relationship with Al Barger that way. The civil thing to do would be to apologize.

In all actuality, you have the relationship backward, though. Al is the candidate and I am the party operative. As such, I am his gofer. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">92434@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:18:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mike Kole on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/12/111028.php#comment-92430</link>
<description>Relax in the safety of your own delusions, Diva. Whenever you&#039;re off on a topic, you will do one one the following: play the race card, call names, insult, put words in the mouth of your opposition.

You&#039;ve done all of these things on this thread. Why not just concede that you&#039;re wrong once in a while? It works wonders, especially when you *are* wrong.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">92430@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2004 07:36:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/12/111028.php#comment-92417</link>
<description>Sorry I left you off the list, Bob2.  You are right.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">92417@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2004 03:38:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by bob2112 on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/12/111028.php#comment-92414</link>
<description>&quot;FCC deregulation, overt assbackward right-wing benefit. Check.&quot; post#98

&quot;FCC rules recently allowing companies to legally buy up signals so one voice can monoploize more stations, under the guise of capitalism.&quot; post#43

Thanks, Lucy! Arrrgh!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">92414@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2004 03:30:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/12/111028.php#comment-92399</link>
<description>The only facts about deregulation on this thread were posted by myself, Steve (Boom), and bhw.  Until his last comment, Mike Kole denied that deregulation has occurred.

Furthermore, the man who would be king* of his own Dungeons and Dragons world is totally tripping in regard to the main thing deregulation achieves -- concentration of ownership.  Deregulate more and the same entities that own multiple television stations, radio stations and newspapers will own even more.   The problems will be exacerbated.  

*Yes, Mike Kole believes he would be king.  He perceives Al Barger as his subject, a gofer.  And entertainment.  A kind of &#039;Mr. Piggy.&#039;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">92399@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2004 01:36:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Andrew Ian Dodge on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/12/111028.php#comment-92366</link>
<description>There are those who will stand up and be counted (like Al) and there are those like MD. 

Deeds not words...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">92366@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:20:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mike Kole on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/12/111028.php#comment-92312</link>
<description>Look, Mac. The FCC as it is now is what you call de-regulated, but I do not call it de-regulated. I call it re-regulated.

A de-regulated FCC would create no artificial barriers to entry for any entity wishing to pop a TV station up. The result would be *lots* of TV stations, and would prevent the possibility that a Sinclair could be the sole media outlet.

You argued that Sinclair was the only outlet in some places. I showed it wasn&#039;t true.

You would be imminently more credible if you stopped calling names, and debated on the facts. Alas, you sweep facts under the rug, never allowing them to get in the way of your bombast.

Que sera sera.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">92312@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:39:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/12/111028.php#comment-92273</link>
<description>Once again, Liberinfant Mike Kole misses the point.  But, then, he is ignorant of the deregulation of the media that makes the point an issue.   As I said before, the problem is twofold:  limited access to other voices and the intent of Sinclair to directly influence the election.  Before deregulation, neither aspect of the problem would have occurred.  There would have been other local options for viewers and the Fairness Doctrine would have required Sinclair be balanced in its airing of political content.  

This not quite equivalent to Kole bragging about doing all the research he needed in regard to the Digital Divide in &lt;u&gt;one minute&lt;/u&gt; on the Internet elsewhere, but it is further evidence of someone imagining hinself to be much brighter than he is.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">92273@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:50:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by bob2112 on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/12/111028.php#comment-92232</link>
<description>RJ, maybe I should have clarified what I meant. I would be kicking those guys asses in 1970-whenever as an NVA victim of their long distance atrocities they inflicted on my family. These guys committed their own share atrocities.

I wouldn&#039;t want to be in the same room with these guys today. The lies they tell hurt too much. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">92232@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:29:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mike Kole on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/12/111028.php#comment-91897</link>
<description>Quoth Mac-Who-Cannot-Be-Named:

&quot;Free speech is not absolute&quot;. I guess she or another dictator will the arbiter of what shall pass. In this case, the FCC will do nicely.

&quot;The problems with what Sinclair does... They are the only local option for many of their viewers who do not have cable&quot;

Once again, Mac&#039;s fact checking is lousy. A two-minute check of Sinclair&#039;s website reveals that they are present mainly in markets with plenty of TV viewing options: Baltimore, Buffalo, Birmingham AL, Cincinnati, Columbus OH, Dayton, Kansas City, Las Vegas, Milwaukee, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Pittsburgh, St. Louis, San Antonio, Syracuse...

They are in places I&#039;m not so familiar with, such as in Asheville, NC. Turns out they have an ABC afiliate in Asheville, which isn&#039;t much, but then again, they also get Nashville TN tv stations as well as Hickory NC stations. They have cable and are fighting to get the local County Commissioners to create the public access channel, which would allow for diverse viewpoints.

OK, how about Paducah, KY? Turns out Paducah has plenty of TV- all the network affiliates and Comcast cable.

I just can&#039;t find a market Sinclair serves where they are a monopoly player, or even where the market they are in isn&#039;t served by cable.

Your &#039;proven ability&#039; seems to be in blowing smoke.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">91897@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 07:57:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by RJ on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/12/111028.php#comment-91868</link>
<description>&quot;someone of my proven ability&quot;

RETCH!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">91868@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:24:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by RJ on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/12/111028.php#comment-91867</link>
<description>&quot;Show me someone who loves Al Barger and I will show you someone with a race problem.&quot;

Is Justene on vacation? Or just utterly useless vis-a-vis race-baiting?

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">91867@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:21:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by RJ on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/12/111028.php#comment-91866</link>
<description>&quot;I am not much of a {...} name caller&quot;

(retch...)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">91866@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:12:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by RJ on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/12/111028.php#comment-91863</link>
<description>&quot;Even when the journalist has the floor, the lawyer is not far away.&quot;

(retch...)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">91863@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:02:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/12/111028.php#comment-91861</link>
<description>Under the old, pre-deregulation rules (needless to say media has been deregulated) there would have been a requirement that Sinclair&#039;s Broadcast be presented as political fare (which would have brought the equal time requirement into play) or that it be aired after the election.  Free speech is not absolute.  The problems with what Sinclair does are twofold:  They are the only local option for many of their viewers who do not have cable, and, they don&#039;t distinguish between opinion and fact.  There will be viewers who believe they are watching a factual presentation.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">91861@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 00:53:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by RJ on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/12/111028.php#comment-91859</link>
<description>&quot;I would be kicking these guys asses myself if they were to be unlucky enough to be face to face with me, as a victim of their long distance atrocities.&quot;

Ooo...I would LOVE to see that...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">91859@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 00:48:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by RJ on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/12/111028.php#comment-91858</link>
<description>&quot;They are attempting to influence public opinion in a coming election. This should be illegal, I don&#039;t know why it is not.&quot;

Have you ever heard of free speech?

Have you ever read Newsweek or Time?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">91858@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 00:42:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by andy marsh on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/12/111028.php#comment-91808</link>
<description>you really do crack me up Bob...glad you&#039;re around here...one of the few liberals with a real sense of humor...you&#039;re a good man charlie brown!!!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">91808@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:52:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by bob2112 on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/12/111028.php#comment-91802</link>
<description>I forgot: Saddam, Tariq Aziz, &amp; Noriega are all nodding off on pure Afgani dope, not naming names.

James Baker is &#039;real&#039; Secretary of State

Dick Cheney still smokes.

Bush is on perfect prescription cocktail
developed by Eli-Lilly.

There is no hope or help on the way if Republicans win. Check, check, check, check, check, check!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">91802@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:15:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/12/111028.php#comment-91797</link>
<description>Now, Bob2, I dunno about the flu shot conspiracy.  ROFL!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">91797@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:44:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by bob2112 on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/12/111028.php#comment-91792</link>
<description>Ballot mailed. Check.

Not influenced by other state&#039;s early voting. Check.

Still believe current version of (R)Party is watered down Fascism. Check.

FCC deregulation, overt assbackward right-wing benefit. Check.

Walmart is current version of government cheese.(Throw &#039;em a bone!) Check.

Tax cuts will bankrupt social programs to enslave the poor, more. Check.

Diebold programmed back door in vote count program for over 1000 counties to allow cyber-terrorism, in hopes of postponing election. Check.

Healthy Forest Initiative attempt to tip the balance for Bush, in swing states WA &amp; OR. Check. 

Flu Shot crisis, purposeful population control tactic to kill Seniors before 2006 Medicare prescription benefit kicks in. Check.

Medicare prescription benefit, carrot to secure as many (R) Senior Citzen votes as possible. Check.

Alan Keyes can kiss my ass! Check.
Tom Delay pure evil! Check.
Karl Rove, please die! Check.
Colin Powell, quit now, man! Check.
Michael Powell, down with the ship. Check.

John McCain, I understand what you have to do. Those guys are sick bastards, &amp; who knows what they&#039;ll do to you if you don&#039;t play ball.
John McCain last (R) standing. Check!



</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">91792@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:38:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva on Al Doing It Right</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/10/12/111028.php#comment-91787</link>
<description>LOL!  So, someone told you Natalie isn&#039;t white and you think that will get you off the hook, Mike Kole.   It won&#039;t.  Your claim that someone of my proven ability is your intellectual inferior is ludicrous.  It is the kind of a thing a bigot would say.  And, frankly, I am a &lt;u&gt;lot&lt;/u&gt; smarter than you will ever be.

Andy, I will see if any of the local media have a picture of the phony voters&#039; pamphlets.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">91787@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:21:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>