Anti-wars and the tally-ho fraternity raise hell at Labour Conference

Written by Mark Edward Manning
Published September 29, 2004
page 1 | 2

The most risible aspect of the whole damnable topic of fox hunting is that before the vote took place, the "nature loving" tally-ho crowd bleated on about how other issues are far most important (education, health care, pensions, the Iraq War, etc.), and how can the Government even think of bringing up fox hunting?

Why, because the bill to ban fox hunting was a promise Blair made in 1997. For those who assert that the PM breaks his promises, this is one he has fulfilled. And for all their concerns about democracy, the great majority of Britons express disgust with fox hunting, even those in rural areas, and, as such, welcome a ban on the blood sport.

But lo! Now that the ban has passed by a huge majority, and enactment by the Parliament Act is swaying over their bloodthirsty tradition like a Damocles sword, the fox killing lobby have decided it is an important issue, come to think of it, what, what!

As one anti-hunt web page I stumbled across succinctly puts it, "Is it that this barbaric sport attracts violent thugs like flies to a lump of shit, or does it simply make ordinarily law-abiding folk go into a frenzy of bloodthirsty yobbishness? Those individuals who derive pleasure from the prolonged pursuit of a terrified creature to the point of its exhaustion and then watch its being ripped to shreds are clearly depraved."

Hallelujah. Believe you me, it's going to take more than the pampered, spoilt-rich family of an ageing rock singer to convince me to "topple" the Government. The pro-hunting lobby is nothing but a very loud, and very sick, minority.

The issues that matter in Britain are (a) asylum seeker and immigration policy, on which Conservative opposition leader Michael Howard has the right idea but Labour have done nothing about; and (b) the European Union "Superstate" Constitution, on which Blair has been keen to enter Britain, but for which the United Kingdom stands to lose much of its sovereignty as a separate nation. Polls reveal the British public in favour of both a firm immigration policy and a reduction in asylum cases, and opposition to joining the European Constitution.

Both issues were strangely absent from the Prime Minister's speech yesterday, however. The anti-war and pro-fox hunt crowd can yell and holler and cry in each other's beers (the two factions naturally go together: if you're anti-war, you're certainly not bothered by butchery, whether by the likes of fox-hunters or Saddam Hussein), but on the two most important issues affecting Britain and British sovereignty, Blair and New Labour remain uncomfortably numb.

page 1 | 2
Mark Edward Manning grew up in Boston, MA and now lives in London, England. He wrote commentaries for The Boston Herald in the mid 1990s.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Anti-wars and the tally-ho fraternity raise hell at Labour Conference
Published: September 29, 2004
Type:
Section: Politics
Writer: Mark Edward Manning
Mark Edward Manning's BC Writer page
Mark Edward Manning's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Mark Edward Manning
All Politics Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — September 29, 2004 @ 10:43AM — simon hb [URL]

Oddly enough, as Blair trotted out the line about how the chap was lucky he lived in a democracy and could make his protest, the protester was being hustled out the Brighton Centre and into a police van to prevent him from doing anything of the sort.

#2 — September 29, 2004 @ 11:06AM — jadester [URL]

come now, blair's probably just taking a leaf out of Bush's book; "freedom...but with limits". see?
Michael Howard doesn't really have the right idea - it goes too far the other way. Without immigrants, Britian would probably be in a worse state than it is.
Also, whilst blair may not be doing too well, i seem to remember the conservatives were an even bigger bunch of crooks and liars.

#3 — September 29, 2004 @ 15:28PM — Big Time Patriot [URL]

Ahh, if we can divert our American animal rights loonies to fight the English animal killing loonies, we could save both countries a lot of grief, perhaps we can ship them out in boats and they can meet in Greenland or some other desolate spot and fight it out.

#4 — September 29, 2004 @ 17:40PM — Mark Edward Manning [URL]

Jadester: "[W]hilst blair may not be doing too well, i seem to remember the conservatives were an even bigger bunch of crooks and liars."

So, Jade, are you sticking with Blair and Labour, or are you tempted to vote Liberal Democrat? Just curious.

#5 — September 29, 2004 @ 17:49PM — Mark Edward Manning [URL]

Simon hb: "[A]s Blair trotted out the line about how the chap was lucky he lived in a democracy and could make his protest, the protester was being hustled out the Brighton Centre and into a police van ..."

That's true, Simon, but it takes place at all political conferences or conventions where any opposition to policy, specifically policy that can be explosive or extremely decisive, are quickly muted and dispersed.

Take for example the case of anti-war protester Medea Benjamin who unfurled an anti-Iraq War banner during the Democratic Convention in Boston in July. She was quickly silenced and hustled out. And these were the Democrats committing the "crime."

At least that chap wasn't beaten and tortured. And he shouldn't have been. He may feel his democratic rights were squelched, but at heated political conventions, true democracy does not exist. That's when you know that we all live in republics, not 100% democracies. But it's still much more preferable than you'd experience in a theocracy, oligarchy or dictatorship.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/20420)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments