<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Indiana gubernatorial mission statements</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:07:06 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/27/024257.php#comment-87571</link>
<description>Mike, if you look at the most popular threads at BC they are often the most silly.   A sure way to get comments is to say something sexual, such as &#039;boobs&#039; or &#039;tits&#039;  in a headline.  Or mention Britney, Christina or Paris.  Moral of story:  Don&#039;t take getting comments so seriously.

Hmmm.  Second thoughts.  One can easily use &#039;boobs&#039; and &#039;libertarians&#039; in a headline.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">87571@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:07:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Hal Pawluk</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/27/024257.php#comment-87566</link>
<description>No, Mike.

For one thing, I haven&#039;t seen a lot of threads about libertarianism, besides one I started because I decided I wanted some info on the topic and everthing I saw elsewhere was so contradictory (it didn&#039;t help) and one by Al Barger shorthly after that (it didn&#039;t help, either).

Aside from that, there are occasional posts by AB, not unexpected since he&#039;s running for office, but I don&#039;t see all that much participation in those, either.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">87566@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:42:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mike Kole</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/27/024257.php#comment-87565</link>
<description>Kind of flies in the face of the fairly voluminous attacks against libertarianism in so many other threads here at BC, Hal.

Thank you.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">87565@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:17:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Hal Pawluk</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/27/024257.php#comment-87562</link>
<description>I noticed your comment in the right-hand column, Mike, so I&#039;m here now with an answer for you:  
&lt;blockquote&gt;Indiana, mission statements, and Libertarians aren&#039;t much of a draw.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
It&#039;s a very narrow topic, while BC reaches the world, where there&#039;s a whole bunch of exciting stuff going on.

You&#039;re welcome.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">87562@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:10:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mike Kole</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/27/024257.php#comment-87557</link>
<description>Hard not to notice the absence of traffic on this thread. Why is that? Is it that it was devoid of the sort of rhetoric that demands knee-jerk responses by the usual suspects, or, is it that there was the issuance of a challenge that none wished to, or was able to meet? I&#039;m torn.

Anyhow, I will be in attendance at the gubernatorial debate tomorrow. I&#039;ll have to </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">87557@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 18:54:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>