<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on The Looney Left of Massachusetts</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 18:18:45 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Bill</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/25/200730.php#comment-87548</link>
<description>When the &quot;left&quot; speaks of intellectual gray areas, the &quot;right&quot; begins their tired un-American rant. One wonders what Mr. Harry Forbes might do when confronted with the philosophical logic of someone like, say, Bertrand Russell. Would he implode?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">87548@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 18:18:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jeff</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/25/200730.php#comment-87427</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;So in the mind (such as it is!) of this poor lady there is little to distinguish between a dictator who builds a Stalinesque terror state over 20 years while killing more than 1 million of its citizens out of paranoia and pure sadism&lt;/i&gt;

Considering that the letter mentioned no person that did any of this I would wonder what is wrong with your mind that you have to invent fictitious arguments to shoot down. Does this &quot;poor lady&quot; have such a good argument that you need to do that? </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">87427@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2004 22:31:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Marc</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/25/200730.php#comment-87307</link>
<description>Sorry Jim, if memory serves correctly you&#039;re not &quot;murrican&quot; so you&#039;re not invited to the close out sale.

Besides Kerry flip-flops may not fit you.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">87307@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2004 06:33:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/25/200730.php#comment-87270</link>
<description>I presume at some point you had an idea you were working towards? So what was it?

Or is it as simple-minded that there was a letter in the newspaper you disagree with, but can&#039;t figure out how to use your words.

As far as I can tell, the letter makes a number of valid rhetorical points.

But then, presenting anything which makes sense or requires thought isn&#039;t a big point with the &#039;murrican wacky right. But keep on what you&#039;re doing, because I expect to clean up big time on the close-out liquidation sale.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">87270@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:04:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>