<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on A Question Posed to Misguided Yokels</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2004 10:32:54 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Hal Pawluk</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/24/151150.php#comment-87216</link>
<description>Read the 9/11 Commission report and you&#039;ll find it supporting the position that there were no operational ties between Iraq and Al Qaeda.

In fact, there were probably more Al Qaeda in Florida than in Iraq.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">87216@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2004 10:32:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by RJ</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/24/151150.php#comment-87175</link>
<description>&quot;al Qaeda and Bin Laden had no ties to Iraq?&quot;

Read the 9/11 Commission&#039;s report. You&#039;d be surprised...

Anyway, the US is not engaged in a &quot;War On Osama.&quot; It is engaged in a &quot;War On Islamic Terrorism.&quot; And Saddam was an Islamic Terrorist.

QED</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">87175@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2004 23:02:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>