The Candidates on Health Care

Written by Eric Olsen
Published September 24, 2004

Health care is a pressing and constant concern in America, 45 million Americans don't have health insurance and people keep asking the candidates what they are going to do about it. Both Bush and Kerry have detailed plans, but experts at the Wharton School don't think either plan will be implemented, nor would they achieve the desired goals even if they were:

    Would either proposal solve the three broad issues facing American health care: mushrooming cost, inadequate availability and uneven quality? Is there any way to stimulate market efficiencies to contain costs and get care to the 45 million Americans who don't have insurance?

    Three Wharton health care experts doubt either candidate's plan could be enacted as proposed - or would lick all those problems if it were. The problems are so complex, and Americans' expectations of top quality affordable care are so deeply rooted, that it's far from clear there is any satisfactory solution for the near term. "I don't think either of them has a clue how to do it," says Mark V. Pauly, professor of health care systems at Wharton.

    ....President Bush wants to encourage people to find insurance on their own. He has proposed tax credits to make insurance more affordable to low-income people, and he wants to extend the reach of Health Savings Accounts, created early in 2004. These allow participants to put pre-tax money into accounts similar to 401(k) retirement accounts. Participants buy health insurance with high deductibles - at least $1,000 a year for an individual, $2,000 for a family. High deductibles are meant to keep premiums as low as possible. Money from the tax-free savings account would be used to pay deductibles, and it could build up over the years. Bush wants to make premiums tax deductible as well. And he'd tackle the soaring cost of malpractice insurance with tort reforms such as capping awards for pain and suffering.

    The total cost for Bush's plan is estimated at about $90 billion over 10 years.

    Kerry's plan is estimated to cost seven to 10 times as much, perhaps more, but it would bring coverage to some 27 million people who don't have it now. That's about 10 times the reach of Bush's proposals. Kerry wants to pay for his plan by rolling back the Bush tax cuts for taxpayers making more than $200,000 a year.

    Kerry calls for a government insurance pool that would cover 75% of the cost of any individual claim exceeding $50,000. That is intended to reduce employer premiums, encouraging more companies to offer coverage. He also would allow ordinary citizens to participate in the health coverage provided federal workers such as members of Congress. And he would loosen eligibility requirements for participation in Medicaid and the State Children's Health Insurance Program.

    ....But neither approach would do enough to change the market forces that keep driving health costs higher, says Lawton R. Burns, professor of health care systems at Wharton. "There are other approaches that would have a bigger impact on markets."

    Many factors drive health care costs up. The public sees the problem as one of rising prices, ignoring the fact that quality improves at a dramatic rate. Today, people get joints replaced and have laproscopic surgery to repair damage that past generations just lived with. "It's increasing because there are now more expensive products and ways of using old products," says Pauly. "Now everyone gets their cholesterol lowered."

    page 1 | 2
Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and publisher of Blogcritics.org, which, quite frankly, rules - as do his wife and four children.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
The Candidates on Health Care
Published: September 24, 2004
Type:
Section: Sci/Tech
Filed Under: Sci/Tech: Science, Culture: Business and Economics
Writer: Eric Olsen
Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
Eric Olsen's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Eric Olsen
Sci/Tech: Science
Culture: Business and Economics
All Sci/Tech Articles
Eric Olsen's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — September 25, 2004 @ 00:05AM — RJ [URL]

My health care insurance costs have just risen from about 4 dollars a week to about 40 dollars a week. Still affordable, and the coverage is good, but that's still a lot of money.

Anyway, market forces are behind the rise in everyone's HC costs. You can't do much about that. It's a high-demand, limited-supply situation.

The fact is, as our population grows older, HC costs will continue to increase. Should the taxpayer pick up the tab, or the patient? It's simply a matter of deciding who is going to pay for it, not whether we are going to have to pay for it.

#2 — September 25, 2004 @ 12:38PM — Hal Pawluk [URL]

The health care costs for many other Americans have gone to $0, at least in the short term, because their employers no longer offer them health care plans.

You're very lucky, RJ, to have the plan you do because for the average American the annual costs are $3,700 for an individual, $10,000 for a family (Business Week data).

Additionally, here are now about 45,000,000 with no health coverage, and this figure is growing about 40% faster than the population.

#3 — June 26, 2005 @ 13:55PM — DrPat [URL]

Let's wake the Vikings! "Spam, spam, spam, spam..."

#4 — June 26, 2005 @ 22:17PM — DrPat [URL]

"Just another Spammer valley Sunday, hey, ey..."

#5 — June 26, 2005 @ 22:57PM — alpha [URL]

I think the last comments were an error where comments were put in the wrong place.

Medical care in the US now, which I sadly know too personally, is not expensive. It has moved to astronomical. It is not obviously paid in real money but insurance and government money (and my money) and it is a national disgrace.

Our $10,000 deductible for 2 persons is about $8000 a year and that is only because they cannot change it just because we have both had big claims. My cardiac bypass in '94 cost me 10 grand and the insurance company about 60. A recurrence in 2002 has cost me about $25,000 and them some inconceivable amount.

My wife was badly hurt recently and I have paid about $28000; the insurance company $125,000 for one of two hospitals with much more to come. Air ambulances were not covered. (If you travel buy extra insurance!)

When Bill Clinton was elected President (not dog catcher which he ended up famous for) he promised universal medical coverage. We received instead 100,000 new police. Medical care was forgotten. George Bush wants to see more money going into the pockets of the HMO and insurance company execs who get $50 million salaries.

What is to happen to the population? To the 45 MILLION without insurance who may get older each year?

It is time for civilized health care in the US whether or not the Republicans think helping Americans maintain their health is "socialized medicine" or not and the Democrats don't want to lose whatever vote it is they are scared of losing.

It is time.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/20216)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments