Bush's "Ownership" Scam: Part II

Written by Hal Pawluk
Published September 23, 2004

I first blogged this Bush scam to help the rich and feed money to companies in the financial services industry in August. That started like this:

Scam Alert: Watch Out For "Ownership Society" And "Investor Class"

Both terms are warning signals of this administration's new push to sell the privatization of health care and social security.

Before you buy into it, ask yourself: "Who benefits?"

The answer is: "Those who have more money than they need already."

Privatization of health care and social security gives them more places to stash the cash without paying any taxes. This plan also gets more money out of the U.S. Treasury and into the coffers of private financial institutions.

And will require a tax increase or cuts in benefits.[The complete post , opens in new window]

At the time, I got reactions that ranged from understanding to posts that threw around words like "marxist fantasy" (referring to the Federal Reserve, no less), "neverland" and other weirdnesses.

But it's even more of a scam than I thought.

This month, we have a new report from the Chicago Business School that has specifics on just how big the payoff to Republican campaign contributors will be:

Creating individual accounts in the social security system would lead to a massive increase in payments of financial fees to private financial management companies ... the net present value of such payments would be $940 billion.

Rather than using the money to close the social security gap, the plan would transfer this money to private financial managers and mutual fund companies.

The fees would be the largest windfall gain in American financial history.

For a worker at the average income level, the fees in privately managed accounts are likely to reduce the ultimate retirement value of their individual accounts by 20 percent for the intermediate case.

[PDF file: The Fees of Private Accounts and the Impact of Social Security Privatization on Financial Managers Austan Goolsbee/University of Chicago, G.S.B./September 2004]

On top of which, as I said in the first piece, the Bush plan will require another $2 trillion to cover the shortfall in payments to present social security recipients.

Clearly the Bush plan for an "ownership society" is a plan designed to give those who already own most of this society even more by taking it away from American workers.

For background, a study from the U. S. Federal Reserve (not a marxist organization) gives us a great perspective on the current distribution of wealth. This chart shows the percentage of all the assets owned by different tiers of net worth:

Household net worth % of assets owned % of equity* % of housing**
Top 1% 29.5% 33.6% 9.0%
Top 10% 64.6% 77.0% 37.2%
Top 50% 94.4% 98.6% 87.7%
Bottom 50% 5.6% 1.4% 12.3%
* Stocks, both owned directly and in mutual funds
** Estimate of market value
Source: Federal Reserve

How to read: "The top 50% of households based on net worth own 98.6% of all stocks, including direct ownership and mutual funds, and 94.4% of all stocks and housing in the U.S. The bottom 50% of U. S. households own only 5.6% of stocks and housing."

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Bush's "Ownership" Scam: Part II
Published: September 23, 2004
Type:
Section: Politics
Writer: Hal Pawluk
Hal Pawluk's BC Writer page
Hal Pawluk's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Hal Pawluk
All Politics Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — September 23, 2004 @ 16:26PM — feste [URL]

Firstly your graphs conveniently do not show the the tax burden paid by the top 50% percentage, which sets up a fairness strawman from the get-go.

Secondly, isn't a tax refund to the non-paying brackets also stealing from the worker's SSI pool?

Lastly, you fail to mention that the $940 billion "windfall" returns to the economy via the 50% shareholding class, many of whom are workers and retirees.

Bottom line is that Congress has been running a SSI ponzi scheme for decades as the Boomer train roared down the demographic tunnel.

Who's kidding whom?



#2 — September 23, 2004 @ 16:46PM — Hal Pawluk [URL]

No, the graph is fine.

I'll be doing something else on taxes later, but for now will say that when you do a comparison of the percentage of income and percentage of taxes paid, there isn't that great a difference for those in the top tiers - the system isn't weighted as much as we are led to believe.

No, the almost $1 trillion will largely go to the top 10% and higher in income.

"Trickle down" is just voodoo economics claptrap that has been throughly discredited.

Bottom line: Social Security benefits will be cut, and the amount cut will go to financial services firms, who will then spend it on management bonuses and invest it in places where they can make the most profit, like China and India.

Really.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/20169)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments