TV Review: "Lost"

Written by Scott Pepper
Published September 23, 2004

ABC is putting a lot of faith in J.J. Abrams with the new action-adventure series "Lost," which premiered tonight. Much has been made of the fact that the pilot for the show is the most expensive ever filmed, but to judge from the first hour of what was intended to be a two-hour premiere, it was money well spent. Though the network is holding the second part for next week, what little we did get to see tonight was most impressive. As with Abrams' spy series "Alias," watching "Lost" feels far more like watching a movie than a TV show.

While the plot of the show is far from original (a commercial airliner crashes on a deserted island, and the 48 people who survive the accident now have to survive the island), the execution is everything. Rather than starting with the crash, we open on Jack (Matthew Fox), who has been knocked unconscious and hurled seemingly hundreds of yards from the beach where the plane crashed. After regaining his composure, Jack breaks into a sprint through the dense jungle until he emerges into the open and absolute chaos. The entire opening sequence, in which we witness the immediate aftermath of the crash, is not for the faint of heart.

We glimpse most of the 48 castaways, albeit briefly, but the focus for now is on Jack, a woman he befriends named Kate (Evangeline Lilly), and Charlie (former Hobbit Dominic Monaghan). Early on in the show, the three set out to recover a transceiver from the plane's cockpit, which landed somewhere on the interior of the island. With these three characters, we get a good glimpse of the tension and struggles that are sure to escalate in future episodes. A nail-biting sequence in which the three have to climb straight up the front half of the plane to the cockpit is the highlight of this first hour, particularly due to a memorable, if short, guest appearance by "Alias" regular Greg Grunberg as the plane's pilot.

Not entirely unexpectedly, secrets abound. The most obvious is the very large, very dangerous "something" that stalks the island. Though no one ever gets a good look at it, its handiwork is on full display late in the episode. Additionally, the teasers hint at other presences (maybe human, maybe not) on the island, as well as plenty of infighting among the castaways.

The premiere of "Lost" is a solid opening for what appears to be a solid show. It appears that very little was lost by showing us just the first hour instead of the first two. Indeed, the cliffhanger ending (of just the sort that enrage and delight "Alias" fans), ensures that most viewers will tune in again next week.

Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
TV Review: "Lost"
Published: September 23, 2004
Type:
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Thriller, Video: Television, Video: Adventure, Video: Action
Writer: Scott Pepper
Scott Pepper's BC Writer page
Scott Pepper's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Scott Pepper
Video: Thriller
Video: Television
Video: Adventure
Video: Action
All Video Articles
Scott Pepper's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — September 23, 2004 @ 10:10AM — Eric Olsen

excellent job Scott, realy glad to see the TV reviews coming in

#2 — September 23, 2004 @ 10:50AM — Matt Paprocki [URL]

I enjoyed this one too, but thanks to my local station, it wasn't shown in widescreen and it was hard to watch. When they began to have turbulence, it was impossible to see what was happening. Thanks a lot guys....

#3 — September 23, 2004 @ 11:04AM — Scott Pepper [URL]

Even in high-def, that scene was a little hard to make out. I'm sitll waiting for the "money shot" of the plane's tail coming off, which I assume will get in flashback next week.

#4 — September 23, 2004 @ 22:31PM — Justene [URL]

The husband (who hated it) mentioned every couple of minutes that such an accident would result in the plane disintegrating and no possible survivors. Does anyone know?

#5 — September 23, 2004 @ 22:36PM — Scott Pepper [URL]

My father-in-law, who used to work on airplanes in the Navy, refused to watch the show for that exact reason.

Me, I'm willing to suspend my disbelief.

#6 — September 24, 2004 @ 14:29PM — Justene [URL]

This review was chosen for Advance.net. You will be able to find it on newspaper sites including Cleveland.com.

#7 — January 26, 2005 @ 06:49AM — Mathew Morton

Are we even givent he info about the speed etc and what causes the plane to crash? People shouldnt say it isnt possible when they dont even know if it was real, what if it was a government thing like some theories say.

#8 — November 20, 2005 @ 14:40PM — Matt

This show is infuriating. The storyline seems to slither along at a snails pace. An episode that will appear to be getting somewhere will suddenly be ended with some bizarre plot twist (the shooting of Eathan for example). It is so unjustly overlong that I can not help thinking about why it been written to last so long. I can imagine that the advertisers love this because they know they can get 2 or maybe 3 series of this pap out before we start turning off. And thats where I come to the most annoying part...I hate it but I still have to watch it.

#9 — April 13, 2006 @ 00:33AM — bo [URL]

.....as mentioned earlier, in tonight's episode there was a song toward the end..artist sounded a lot like Sam & Dave...but am probably wrong...does anyone who title and or artist ????

#10 — April 13, 2006 @ 01:22AM — bo [URL]

..have new info. the song Locke was playing the Hatch was "snakes on the plane' by Jody Hicks....the blues song towards the end was "these arms of mine" by Otis Redding.....out

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/20165)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments