<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Rather Impeachable</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:08:29 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Dawn</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/21/111009.php#comment-86439</link>
<description>I have had the sinking feeling that as we slide further into the 21 century that we are striking a precarious balance between truth and fiction.

Look at &quot;reality tv&quot; - how much of that is actual reality and how much of it is orchestrated.

This election, some might say, is testing the very essence of democracy.  With so much power and influence being wielded by the right (think Enron/big business and the entire Bush/Cheney oligarchy)- it&#039;s no wonder that people like Dan Rather (right or wrong) would lay their entire career on the line if they thought that they could influence in even the tiniest way, the outcome of this election.

That is the force of the hatred for Bush and those who oppose him.  

What we really should be asking ourselves is WHY?  Why is there this movement of people so determined to oust this &quot;regime&quot; to the extent that they would lie, cheat and steal to do so.

Talk about Manchurian Candidate - what we are witnessing is the most basic elements of conflict - a struggle at its purest core for control of the most premier nation.

My only question is - which side is best suited to lead us?

So far, Bush has done a real &quot;bang up&quot; job.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">86439@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:08:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by norelpref</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/21/111009.php#comment-86435</link>
<description>And FOX Network News is non-partisan? NBC and ABC are non-partisan? Please. What I find surprising is that Rather takes a critical look at President-Select Bush, which other corporate controlled news sources seem reluctant to do.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">86435@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 14:35:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bryan</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/21/111009.php#comment-86409</link>
<description>I read somewhere that this might not affect Rathers career TODAY, but it may 6 months from now.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">86409@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:30:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Craig Lyndall</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/21/111009.php#comment-86407</link>
<description>I don&#039;t think this is done shaking out.  I am just preparing for it.  I don&#039;t have an an answer for you, I am just saying that the reputation has fallen in my opinion and I hope other people agree with me because I think it is a serious offense.  Just talking about it is good enough for now.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">86407@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:17:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Hal Pawluk</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/21/111009.php#comment-86403</link>
<description>So okay, Dan Rather is partisan - now what?

Any recommendations?  Your piece left me hanging, waiting for that other shoe to drop.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">86403@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:34:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>