<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on The Next Big Thing</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 16:39:39 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Half Baked</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/19/141323.php#comment-86455</link>
<description>Sorry for the late reply, I&#039;ve been off in London at a bubble convention, where I&#039;ve restocked supplies, so don&#039;t worry (too much) about the one you&#039;ve broken.

As for singularities, now that the plurality of black holes have proven non-singular, there is a far sight fewer of them.  And I agree, more are not likely to be generated by any amount of pissing.  If I get your meaning.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">86455@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2004 16:39:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/19/141323.php#comment-86027</link>
<description>Not to burst your bubble (oh, wait, that .whatever bubble already burst), but in the &quot;New New Thing&quot;, the reason Jim Clark took Netscape public was so he could build a boat with a taller mast than somebody else.

The singularity isn&#039;t going to happen as a result of pissing contests.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">86027@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2004 16:28:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>