Rescue American Jobs survey - Revise and extend

Written by Al Barger
Published September 19, 2004
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Also, the protectionist mentality tends to play to our lowest emotional centers, the xenophobic and racist impulses from the lower part of our animal natures. It is neither accurate nor spiritually uplifting to blame poor Mexicans or Malaysians for our economic problems. Hey they're just trying to feed the kids like anybody else.

You can't just demand by law that companies hire people, or keep people on payrolls when they're not making money on them. Well, you CAN, but it's just not going to work. They'll just end up going broke. The command economy of the Soviet Union and every place that tries similar has been utterly dismal.

As Ayn Rand noted in a critical insight, you can't force someone to THINK. You can force them to stand up, or sit down. You simply cannot force or demand that people create wealth, though. This involves huge complexes thinking and acting that can only be done voluntarily.

The more you restrict people's freedom of action, the more you restrict their ability to create wealth. Forcing people by law to act against the best judgment of their own thinking actively works against their success. You simply can't just pass a law to make bad economic policies work.

Now, what has been shown to really promote more and better jobs in practice is a free market, with stable rule of law, a minimum of regulations, and a minimum of taxes. As would seem absolutely intuitive to me, this approach maximizes wealth creation, business profits and growth in demand for labor, generating more and better jobs.

Generally, the best thing to create jobs and prosperity in the country is to do things to improve the business climate. It might satisfy some resentment to see a rich guy knocked down, but the guy who is making the most money is generally going to be the one creating the most jobs.

There's no such thing as a level playing field. Life isn't fair. Third World countries will generally have certain economic vantages such as lower environmental standards. We might be a little more mindful of the economic costs of EPA rules and high OSHA workplace standards, but we're not going to abandon our high standards - nor should we.

On the other hand, Americans have lots of advantages working for us. We have a much better, more consistent and stable rule of law. We have vast natural resources. We have about the best university system in the world.

The best thing we can do is to make it more attractive to do business here. We're going to lose out on some lower end jobs because dirt poor South Americans will do them cheaper. That can't be helped. However, we can do tort reform, lower taxes, and improve education. We can try to streamline and simplify some of the thousands of pages of tax code, and business regulations.

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Unreformed hawkish Hoosier hillbilly Al Barger runs the still squeezin' down the psychodelic Kentucky moonshine at More Things. What with the paranoid religious visions, the Pentecostal music, visions of God and anarchy running amok and such, somebody oughta call the cops to report his out of control freedom of conscience. Till they come to take him away somewhere where he can't hurt anyone else, you can check out his weekly column of new album releases.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Rescue American Jobs survey - Revise and extend
Published: September 19, 2004
Type:
Section: Politics
Filed Under: Culture: Business and Economics
Writer: Al Barger
Al Barger's BC Writer page
Al Barger's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Al Barger
Culture: Business and Economics
All Politics Articles
Al Barger's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — September 19, 2004 @ 22:44PM — RJ [URL]

Good responses. You can hardly blame them for giving you an "F" though. These are, after all, protectionists...

#2 — July 6, 2006 @ 22:57PM — Valerie Chau

The H-1B Prevailing Wage is Substantially Below the Median Wage of U.S. Workers

While several bills, such as the "SKIL Act of 2006," aim to nearly double the annual H-1B quota, all such bills provide for the legal displacement of U.S. workers by underpaid foreign workers under a flawed prevailing wage provision. The H-1B "prevailing wage" is a sham that allows employers to pay H-1B workers 25% below market wages while claiming full compliance with the law.

Sacramento, CA (PRWEB) July 6, 2006 -- The Programmers Guild, an organization advocating for US-based computer professionals, finds that the prevailing wage protections in pending immigration legislation, such as the "SKIL Bill," authorize corporations to pay foreign tech workers $25,000 below the wage paid to average U.S. workers in the same professions.

The General Accountability Office (GAO) reports that the Department of Labor (DOL) had approved thousands of H-1B applications, in spite of clear prevailing wage violations within the applications. But GAO did not consider whether the prevailing wages themselves were flawed. Had GAO evaluated the DOL's prevailing wages against actual U.S. wages, the number of violations might have exceeded one hundred thousand.

In the Silicon Valley, California region, the median wage in 2004 for the occupation "computer programmer" was $83,500. This median represents the wages for U.S. workers with average skills and experience. But of the 9721 LCAs (Labor Condition Applications) for H-1B computer programmer in the region in fiscal year 2005, 2877 (29%) were for a salary of $57,000 or less, and fully 8193 (84%) paid less than the median wage of $83,500.

Proponents of the H-1B program argue that H-1B workers are the "best and brightest" workers in the world, bringing specialized skills that U.S. workers lack. But if wages are an indication of value, the opposite is true: In Silicon Valley only 16% of H-1B workers are earning at least what an average American programmer earns, and this ratio holds across the U.S.

In Fiscal Year 2005 the Department of Labor certified that H-1B computer programmers in Silicon Valley earning as low as $40,000 per year, and these wages were found to be in compliance with prevailing wage requirements by both the DOL and the GAO.

Rather than defining "prevailing wage" as the median wage of U.S. workers within the occupational category, DOL defines four wage levels. For San Jose this scale is:

Level 1 wage: $57,762 year
Level 2 wage: $72,800 year
Level 3 wage: $87,838 year
Level 4 wage: $102,877 year

DOL further specifies that this occupation is in "O*Net JobZone 4" and requires a Bachelor's degree. Reference: flcdatacenter.com

The 2004 O*Net wage details for Computer Programmer are found by going to the following link and then scrolling to the bottom and selecting "California" and then "San Jose" in "Wages by Metropolitan areas." The result is a normalized wage distribution for computer programmers in Silicon Valley:

10th Percentile: $53,700
25th Percentile: $66,500
Median: $83,500
75th Percentile: $103,800
90th Percentile: $129,000

Reference: onetcenter.org

To casual observers everything appears to be in order: The four wage levels fall roughly within these five normal distribution points. The flaw is that DOL directs employers to use the Level One (17th percentile) wage UNLESS the requirements of the position exceed "a minimum of two to four years of work-related skill, knowledge, or experience is needed for these occupations. For example, an accountant must complete four years of college and work for several years in accounting to be considered qualified."

Reference: flcdatecenter.com

Thus, even if the H-1B worker possesses a PhD, if the job they are filling does not require an advanced degree, DOL directs employers to utilize Wage Level One as their prevailing wage.

The DOL wage level worksheet is here:

Step 1: Enter Wage Level 1

Step 2: If the years of experience are GREATER THAN the low-end O*NET (e.g., more than 2-4 years), add a 1, 2, or 3 as appropriate.

Step 3: If the required education is GREATER THAN a BS degree, add 1 or 2 as appropriate.

Step 4: If the job requires special skills or licensing BEYOND what the profession normally requires, add a 1 or 2 as appropriate.

Step 5: If the job includes SUPERVISORY duties, add 1.

SUM: For an average job requiring average skills and education, DOL instructs employers to use wage level 1
DOL's "prevailing wage" that is $25,000 below the wages of average-skilled U.S. workers in the same job classification is a sham. Congress, DOL, and GAO should defend how wages at the 3rd to 17th percentile of what average U.S. workers earn are "prevailing wages," or they should fix the problem within their pending H-1B legislation.

The Programmers Guild calls on Congress to set the base "Prevailing Wage" for H-1B and L-1 workers as the median wage earned by U.S. workers within the classification for the region. Currently Congress and DOL are creating a financial incentive for corporations to lay off their skilled U.S. staff and replacing them with foreign workers on H-1B and L-1 visas.

ABOUT US

The Programmers Guild advocates for the interests of U.S. computer programmers and other tech workers. The Guild endorses Congressman Pascrell's H.R. 4378, which would amend H-1B legislation to require employers to first recruit U.S. workers, along with other protections. See www.programmersguild.org for more information.

REFERENCES


SKIL Act of 2006
(S.2691): Commentary on House version of SKIL Bill (H.R. 5744). HR.4378 - Pascrell Defend the American Dream Act of 2005

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/19989)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments