<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Jet Gets Born</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2004 14:49:03 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/18/133325.php#comment-85851</link>
<description>this record reminded me of when rock bands were not afraid to show a littler diversity of sound on a single release.

in particular, it reminded me of the Rolling Stones&#039; &quot;Some Girls&quot;. not that it all sounds like the Stones but that it has a lot of different stuff going on.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">85851@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2004 14:49:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/18/133325.php#comment-85834</link>
<description>thanks Manny, nice to see you back - I hear them as disinctly updating the bands you named by going more jagged, kind of along the lines of White Stripes</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">85834@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2004 13:39:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>