Bush Wants to Cut FAA Funding Significantly

Written by Justin Delabar
Published September 17, 2004

On Tuesday major communication outages caused air traffic controllers in Los Angeles to scramble in attempts to reestablish contact with planes in the air, causing numerous delays, several close calls and more than a few headaches. The Bush administration has responded to the incident by citing its need to cut the Federal Aviation Administration's budget for air traffic control equipment by 12.6%, justifiably causing outrage among some within theaviation industry:

Air traffic controllers fear if Congress goes along with the cut it will force them to work with outdated equipment longer and prevent new backup systems from being installed.

Tom Brantley, president of the Professional Airways Systems Specialists union, said the systems that keep track of the planes in the centers between airport towers will soon reach their capacity.

"Cutting the budget by almost 14 percent is insane," said Brantley, who represents the people who maintain air traffic control equipment. "Seventy percent of the systems out there are in need of upgrade or replacement."

Basically, the administration is strapped for funds due to the record deficit and is attempting to conserve wherever it can (which includes, insanely enough, homeland security and education.) The issue with cutting this particular budgetary item is that updated communication equipment is a very good thing for the airline industry — it makes sure planes do not fly into each other and also could be of use if a plane is being hijacked. Just think, if widespread communication blackouts grow in number, terrorists could easily take a plane without anyone on the ground being immediately aware of what is going on within the cockpit until it's too late.

Hold back on that dwindling budget, guys. It only helps make us less safe and all.

More at Digital Dissent.

Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Bush Wants to Cut FAA Funding Significantly
Published: September 17, 2004
Type:
Section: Politics
Writer: Justin Delabar
Justin Delabar's BC Writer page
Justin Delabar's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Justin Delabar
All Politics Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — September 17, 2004 @ 08:34AM — simon hb [URL]

Erm... isn't the administration strapped for funds because it's burning through millions and millions in Iraq?

Oh, the irony: pissing money away keeping Fox News in War on Terror stories will probably result in planes just dropping out the sky due to equipment giving out.

#2 — September 17, 2004 @ 22:29PM — Jason Koulouras [URL]

What is it with Republican Presidents and the Air Traffic Controllers...(Remember Reagan firing them all)

#3 — September 18, 2004 @ 01:03AM — the gaulieter

yeah , i remember those firings jason....and hundreds of planes crashed every day for months on end....

#4 — September 18, 2004 @ 01:45AM — Evilwhiteguy [URL]

Reagan fired them all because they broke a federal law that mandated they didn't have the right to strike. They did, and he fired them (mmm...jellybeans).

It seems to me that air traffic control isn't the best place to start cutting, if cuts need to be done. How about the national endowment for the arts? I would vote for my tax dollars funding new equipment for air traffic control before elephant dung slung on a picture of the Virgin Mary.

Or how about cutting NPR? Tell them to start brining in some advertising dollars like every other radio outfit in the country or close up shop. Seriously, they could fund themselves if they had to.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/19916)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments