http://blogcritics.org/ A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously. en Copyright 2005 by the authors Wed, 15 Sep 2004 11:26:56 EDT http://backend.userland.com/rss Blogcritics.org custom software http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/14/111944.php#comment-85183 Yeah! And President Clinton served too! Oh, wait, no... he didn't. Vic 85183@blogcritics.org Wed, 15 Sep 2004 11:26:56 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/14/111944.php#comment-85168 one of the candidates has a track record in the office in question. It seems to me the focus of the debate should be whether or not you approve of that candidate's handling of the office, and whether or not you think the other candidate can do a better job. 85168@blogcritics.org Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:14:59 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/14/111944.php#comment-85109 marc: try this link www.georgewbushisapussy.com or try www.dickcheneyisanasswipe.com really marc....what is a freaking link going to prove? jack e. jett 85109@blogcritics.org Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:16:55 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/14/111944.php#comment-85097 I would say enough of looking back 30 years - what are these candidates going to do for America and the World today and tomorrow - what happened 30 years ago is frankly irrelevant to the pressing issues of today. America should look forward not backwards 85097@blogcritics.org Tue, 14 Sep 2004 21:33:42 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/14/111944.php#comment-85076 I still don't see how at least 3.5 great years of good service (and the rest just average) in the National Guard is anything to squak at? Sure, it wasn't Vietnam -- but hell, it was our military, and he served us well. Here here to both of them. 85076@blogcritics.org Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:31:23 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/14/111944.php#comment-85071 Silver Star? Well maybe, maybe <a href="http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/002506.php" target="_blank">not</a>, and we already know his first purple is a figment of his imagination. jej would you care to provide a link that gives proof that Bush didn't win the 2000 election? 85071@blogcritics.org Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:10:17 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/14/111944.php#comment-85006 Even assuming they're forged, it doesn't change the basic facts: Kerry served. Bush didn't. ie. one is a hero with a silver star and personal integrity, the other is a Privileged Chickenhawk. ~Next! 85006@blogcritics.org Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:43:06 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/14/111944.php#comment-85002 as much as i hate to admit it. i think they are forged. worse than that, i am thinking that bush is going to be our next president. he may really get elected this time. i am trying to find a positive way of looking at all of this. jack 85002@blogcritics.org Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:33:43 EDT