First Blood DVD Review

Written by Matt Paprocki
Published September 12, 2004

It's a shame that the "Rambo" series de-evolved into a cheap knock-off of other countless action movies. Most people write off the first film like they do the sequels. The original is a brutal, vicious, fight for survival against a small town that rejected the Vietnam War hero, based off an even more violent book. "First Blood" is not for the squeamish, but a great way to spend an evening if you don't mind some pretty grim scenes.

John Rambo (Sylvester Stallone) visits the small town of Hope, trying to find a friend he met in Vietnam. Upon his arrival, he finds his friend is dead (from cancer caused by the war) and is ushered out of town by the local sheriff (Brian Dennehy). Refusing to leave, he is taken in and abused by the authorities. After lashing out, he heads for a forest just outside of town where the battle between the Green Beret and local police force begins.

One of the most often misinterpreted facts about this film is that Rambo himself never really kills anyone until the end, and even then, he is only doing so in order to defend himself. He is simply struggling to survive in the world that rejected him. Though he is a trained killer, he simply wants to forget the things that have happened to him and move on. People refuse him that right.

Sylvester Stallone creates his second most recognizable character (just behind Rocky) in this film and does a great job considering he hardly speaks until his final mental breakdown in the end. The tension created by director Ted Kotcheff (who more recently directed episodes of "Law & Order") is wonderful. The forest photography is great, giving the lead character his only real advantage other than a survival knife.

As usual, not everything is perfect here. The final twenty-minutes really dumb down the entire film, featuring Rambo mindlessly destroying the small town, mimicking what is about to come with sequels. The scenes of him holding a massive weapon in one hand while the ammo dwindles away in the other have been the subject of countless parodies. Richard Crenna, playing the Colonel who trained Rambo, is just laughable, overacting every line given to him.

Still, "First Blood" is easily one of the best "one-man-army" movies ever made. The subtexts are obvious, giving the movie some purpose, unlike so many other action films (including the sequels). The book, as usual, is better, but watching Stallone in action against all odds is unforgettable. (**** out of *****)

page 1 | 2
Matt Paprocki is the reviews editor for Digital Press, a video game website with an appreciation for the retro side of the industry. The deep game collection which spans nearly 30 systems and 2,000 games line his walls for research purposes. Matt strives to bring credibility to video game journalism, and take it in a new direction to aid the industry in becoming respected with all forms entertainment media.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
First Blood DVD Review
Published: September 12, 2004
Type:
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Action, Video: Drama, Video: Thriller
Writer: Matt Paprocki
Matt Paprocki's BC Writer page
Matt Paprocki's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Matt Paprocki
Video: Action
Video: Drama
Video: Thriller
All Video Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — September 13, 2004 @ 19:45PM — Eric Olsen

I vividly recall the visceral impact this had the first time I saw it - it was tht impact (and the ticket sales, of course) that led to the seemingly endless sequels, but we are dishonest if we deny that initial impact. Good job!

#2 — January 30, 2007 @ 22:48PM — poof pants


Ok,

I have just watched the original "First Blood" from 1982 again, for the 1st time in like about 10 years & it got me to thinking how Hollywood ended up skewing the original message intended by the 1st movie, by making all the sequels.
The 1st one was clearly meant to depict how hard life was for the Vietnam Vets, whom had come home & how they faced difficulty adjusting to Civillian life. The whole message behind the movie is summed up beautifukky in Stallones performance at the end, where Col. Troutman is trying to calm him down. This scene dramatically, I believe communicates the anguish these guys went through.
The part where Hollywood screwed up though, was all the destruction & action scenes. Whether they intended to, or not, that touched off a public demand for more of the same & soon you had your Rambo's 2, 3 & Die Hards etc...so while Hollywood got big $$$ from the spin-off effect. I believe that it only distracts from the original, which was more like a Docu-Drama, with lots of explosions.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/19746)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments