Timequake, by Kurt Vonnegut
Published September 10, 2004
In his novels and lectures, Vonnegut has long promoted artificial extended families as a way to create bonds and assuage alienation between people. Vonnegut's fans — and I, despite my critical reservations, consider myself one — form such a family. To this clan, Vonnegut is like an amusing uncle who visits from Minneapolis every few years. Picking up a new Vonnegut or returning to an old one, is like spending time with funny, cranky old Uncle Kurt. Even at his most disappointing, he inspires a certain fondness and familial devotion. You'd hardly reject your uncle just because he rambles a bit or repeats himself, would you?
In Timequake, Vonnegut's musings on life, with the recurring theme that "the most highly evoloved Earthling creatures fund being alive embarrassing or much worse," are shaded with more grimness than before, as if Vonnegut is bending under the weight of the thoughts that once buoyed up his work. The upside is that he has blended fable and memoir more intricately and playfully than ever before. In his essayistic interludes and insertion of himslef into his narratives, Vonnegut is a sort of poor-man's Milan Kundera; in Timequake, the levels of reality blend more smoothly and pointedly than in any of his novels since Slaughterhouse-Five.
For diehard Vonnegut fans, Timequake is an essential, if none too artistically rigorous, footnote to his career.
In one sense, it seems natural to let Vonnegut retire. Turning 75 on November 11, and with 19 volumes of "curious tales told with ink on bleached and flattened wood pulp" behind him, he's earned a rest, and has left more work that do most writers. But the desultory pleasures Timequake offers are tempered by the knowledge that this is to be his last book — knowledge that usually comes only with a writer's death.
Goodbye, Uncle Kurt. We will miss you.
- Timequake, by Kurt Vonnegut
- Published: September 10, 2004
- Type:
- Section: Books
- Writer: Sean Scott
- Sean Scott's BC Writer page
- Sean Scott's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
I still think his earlier work is extaordinary, but he became increasingly bitter and defeatist over time, less funny and humane. I haven't read this one but it sounds like more of the same. Thanks Sean!
Eric: "...he became increasingly bitter and defeatist over time, less funny and humane."
As my 84 year old mother says, "Growing old ain't for wimps."
PS: Shark's favorite Vonnegut masterpiece = "Galapagos"
Sharky, you have bleak bleak view of human nature and the future of mankind. I don't mind being presented with possible worst-case scenarios in a cautionary manner, but I am not much interested in dispirited fatalism, especially when it isn't leavened with humor.
"...Sharky, you have bleak bleak view of human nature and the future of mankind..."
...Based on evidence from past performance.
(--And Reality ain't for wimps either!)
BTW: Eric, mentioning my mother and Vonnegut in the same breath was meant to indicate that the wisdom of age tends to dampen naive idealism.
We'll see what a happy little optimist you are when you've got more aches from the past than dreams of the future.
Shark, I'm 46 and from a long line of youthful optimists - I don't see my outlook changing much.





Kurt's my favorite contemporary author. The movies they make out of his stories are abominations, but I've loved the stories. I enjoy them more the older I get appreciate more of the nuances that come from 'life experience'.
He compares to Mark Twain for brillant bitter satire too. They are both real firebrands on religion. I adore both of their truly sarcastic takes on the true believers. :)