A label wakes up?

Written by Casper
Published September 05, 2004

Jorgen Larsen, CEO of Universal Music International, may just be one of those who gets it — he writes cogently as to how the music industry should be facing the new environment of the web:

...[T]he internet also represents the greatest silver lining in our 100-year history, once legitimate delivery systems can make all the music in the world available to internet-connected consumers. That era is just around the corner, as exemplified by the recent European launches of Apple's iTunes, Napster (the legitimate version), and T-Mobile's EarPhones. Typical of these offerings is that they belong to technology and telephone companies and there is no cross-ownership by music companies.
This is how it should be, because the music industry makes music, and the rest is distribution. Criticism that we slept through the internet revolution is misplaced, because we are not in the IT, technology, cable or phone businesses. Our only core business is to build the strongest possible artist rosters and make incredibly good recordings that people want to buy and own in whichever form suits them the best.
The internet represents the greatest growth opportunity I have ever experienced, and I would expect the legitimate online music market to grow to (your guess!) thereby possibly leading to a doubling of the total music market, physical and online combined, over the next five years.

A shocking idea, I know. Let the people who excel at distribution handle distribution, and let those who excel at creating content focus on making good music. That's just crazy enough to work.

Thanks to Coolfer Glenn for the tip.

Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
A label wakes up?
Published: September 05, 2004
Type:
Section: Sci/Tech
Filed Under: Sci/Tech: Internet, Culture: Media, Music: Business, Music: Recording, Music: News
Writer: Casper
Casper's BC Writer page
Casper's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Casper
Sci/Tech: Internet
Culture: Media
Music: Business
Music: Recording
Music: News
All Sci/Tech Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — September 6, 2004 @ 00:18AM — Triniman [URL]

Downloading tracks for $.99 each still doesn't make a lot of sense...when you can buy the entire CD for less than you could if you downloaded all the tracks at that price.

Someone needs to come up the non-CD album, and sell it at a price commensurate with the production and marketing costs, which doesn't have to be as much as the major labels spend. The major labels are essentially lending institutions - banks. They market "product" to us and have commoditized music. Today, consumers have so much choice and the internet provides a powerful marketing medium for smaller labels, that consumers are broadening their tastes.

Artists who are in demand also have no problem selling merchandise - something that obviously cannot be illegally downloaded.

Quit trying to rip up off with $.99 downloads. Sell downloadable tracks of older albums for a lot less than $.99.

Support indie labels. Major labels, stop foisting new cookie-cutter artists who have not paid their dues, upon us. Consumers want variety and artists they can discern from all the others.

Rant over.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/19489)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments