That's interesting. 400-1,000 votes were found to be illegal, and just because Democrats account for 68% of all registered voters, you dump all the criminals in that group.

Presumably, the NY Post only bothered to compare NY & FLA records - doubtless, since people retire to Florida from all over America, you could find an equal, if not greater, number of people from more staunchily Republican States equally double-booked?

Would i be correct in assuming that that, though, would be a "muddle" rather than "corruption"?

Say, Boom. 68-12-16 is the kind of ratio that would have won things in Florida for Gore if only spread over a more significant constituency, than double-voting retirees, heh?

But the important thing is an honest election, right? So let's do the right thing and delete those illegal tallies from the record, from all of the double-voting folks, regardless of party.

But the important thing is an honest election, right? So let's do the right thing

Personally, Mike, I believe that Kathleen Harris, Jeb Bush and Scalia prevented it from being an honest election, even if it still would have ultimately gone to Bush. Somebody who would have won Florida legally could still be capable of cheating. That's still my opinion, regardless of how many conservatives are sick of hearing about it.

Sure, I am all for deleting illegal votes on any side. To me, though, since we can't take back the last 4 years, that's not near as important as countering right wing rhetoric and falsehood, like the assumption that ALL illegal votes MUST be Democrat. Not surprising conservatives or libertarians gloss over that and instead tout the nobility of being 'honest'. Thanks for reinforcing the assumption.

Of course it's only bad when a liberal groups everybody else together, I forgot.

Annnd, (although I don't have a source for this anymore) those computer voting systems are funded by big big republicans. But of course, you ignored that scandal when it came out.