<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Bestseller List Does Not Always Equal Sales</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2004 00:21:19 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by boomcrashbaby</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/22/163653.php#comment-81029</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;And, the Internet is also having an impact on the List. A large preorder, usually at Amazon, can be created by having someone like Drudge tell his munchkins to buy a book. That will put the book on the List despite a lack of interest by readers in general.&lt;/i&gt;

This reminds me of something I read awhile back that I cannot substantiate or come up with exact figures right now, but it was about the time Ann Coulter came out with her first book. Suddenly it was a best seller and heavily promoted by bookstore chains, etc. but almost nobody was buying it. So they looked into why it was considered a best seller when individuals weren&#039;t buying it. It was because conservative groups/churches, bought it in mass quantity, by the thousands, to distribute freely among their constituents. Constituents that apparently were walking past it in the bookstores. This is what put it on the best seller list. So now she&#039;s suddenly credible and a serious author, when the reality of the situation is that many of her books were stored in warehouses that people were unable to give away.

(This is what I read awhile back, I can&#039;t substantiate it with links).
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">81029@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2004 00:21:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/22/163653.php#comment-81026</link>
<description>The other significant aspect of having a book on the NYT Bestseller List is name recognition.  So, even if the List does not mean more bucks for a particular  book for the author, it makes her marketable by making her known.   There is likely a cumulative effect that is not being factored in.   Also, I would like to know more about the broad middle of writers who are neither first timers, nor celebrities of commercial writing.  My guess is that being on the list even once has significant impact on name recognition.

I am not aware of any studies, but, based on being a writer and around writers for years, I suspect that being reviewed in the NYT may matter more for the broad middle.  That way, one gets the name recognition without having to sell enough books to make the List.

And, the Internet is also having an impact on the List.  A large preorder, usually at Amazon,  can be created by having someone like Drudge tell his munchkins to buy a book.  That will put the book on the List despite a lack of interest by readers in general.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">81026@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2004 23:44:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Anita Campbell</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/22/163653.php#comment-81021</link>
<description>Initially I was surprised by the study.  But the whole publishing industry has changed so dramatically in the last decade, that I guess I shouldn&#039;t be.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">81021@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2004 23:08:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by TDavid</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/22/163653.php#comment-80995</link>
<description>Interesting stuff, thanks Anita. I&#039;ve always wondered why they make such a big deal on the top of books about it being a &quot;New York Times Besteller&quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">80995@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2004 17:36:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>