Tech Pro's Sound Off on Google IPO

Written by All American Investor
Published August 22, 2004
page 1 | 2 | 3

And when it did, the Wall Street establishment, which had been basically asked to dig its own grave as a condition of participation, bit back with glee. The end result is that auctions, long a campaign of real financial rebels such as Bill Hambrecht, now look messy, dangerous and inefficient, which is a shame..

Esther Dyson
Editor at large, Cnet Networks

Of course those analysts want to paint the whole IPO as a dismal failure because it more or less bypassed Wall Street and its gatekeepers.

(But) the market worked. My read of it is that the initial hoopla was driven mostly by the press. Perhaps foolishly, the company responded by pricing the deal at a premium to what rational analysts said it was worth.

That made sense for a while. Indeed, some people suggested the stock was still underpriced. Then the backlash began, as potential investors talked down the price and the (technology) stock market overall started retreating.

Google made and revealed a number of blunders, including an atypical bout of excessive openness — an interview with Playboy. I'd rather criticize Google for excessive secrecy. But in the end, the company is open about what it says, if a bit smug, and open about what it will not tell..

Bill Burnham
Managing partner, Softbank Capital Partners

No matter how hot an IPO is perceived to be, the company still has to listen to Wall Street. Companies have to remember that investment managers have more than 10,000 potential stocks to choose from. That means a company has go the extra mile to convince these money managers that its stock is going to make them money

Google is a U.S. company, and it helps cement the pre-eminent position of the U.S. in the global Internet industry. The tens of thousands of domestic, skilled jobs that Internet companies such as Google have created not only help offset some of the job losses from some forms of outsourcing, but also help the U.S. industrial base migrate from old, slow-growth industries toward new, high-growth industries. Google, with its freewheeling, inventive culture and strong technology, is a great example of how U.S. industry can grow and prosper even in the face of increasing competition from overseas..

page 1 | 2 | 3
My name is Robert T DeMarco and I am a caregiver by choice. For those of you unfamiliar with the term "caregiver" it means someone who is responsible for the care and well-being of another, in my case, my 90-year-old mother who has Alzheimer's. There are millions of caregivers spread across the world, and perhaps surprisingly, 41% of us are male. I have a series of blogs including The Alzheimer’s Reading Room Weblog , The CareGiver Weblog , and The Robert T DeMarco Weblog .
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Tech Pro's Sound Off on Google IPO
Published: August 22, 2004
Type:
Section: Sci/Tech
Filed Under: Culture: Business and Economics, Sci/Tech: Internet, Sci/Tech: Software
Writer: All American Investor
All American Investor's BC Writer page
All American Investor's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by All American Investor
Culture: Business and Economics
Sci/Tech: Internet
Sci/Tech: Software
All Sci/Tech Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — August 24, 2004 @ 09:54AM — Phillip Winn [URL]

Gee, I came here because I saw the headline and wondered who turned off which tech pro's sound, and now it turns out that it isn't that at all. In fact, there is more than one tech pro, and apparently they do not possess the sound which is off, but rather are sounding off.

So then it seems that instead of: Tech Pro's Sound Off, it should be: Tech Pros Sound Off. As in, no apostrophe.

#2 — August 24, 2004 @ 10:17AM — Robert T DeMarco [URL]

Phil..

Perhaps if you had taken the entire headline into consideration you would have noticed this post is about the Google IPO (so you won't get confused, IPO stands for initial public offering).

As far as I can tell the word Pros means: an argument or evidence in affirmation. In other words like Pros and Cons. The word Pro's in this context connotates professionals. It is not unusual to shorten words in headlines due to space constraints. Next time I will take your comment into consideration and instead put Professionals in the headline, instead of Pro's insuring less confusion on the part of some.

Any comment on the Google IPO or the comments of the pro's (professionals)?

bob

#3 — August 24, 2004 @ 10:21AM — bhw [URL]

Philip is correct. You make "pro" [abbreviation of "professional"] plural by adding an 's' without the apostrophe. So "pros" is the plural form of the abbreviation, and "pro's" is the possessive form of the abbreviation [singular, not plural].

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/18934)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments