A letter from the Kerry Campaign

Written by Jeremy Chrysler
Published August 20, 2004
page 1 | 2

Regarding Kerry's river combat strategy turned campaign metaphor of "turning your boat into the attacker" may succeed, but it ignores a few central issues. First of all, Kerry has a lot of exposed flesh here, and while he may be shooting back, he's still getting shot at. His campaign released a response to the "Christmas in Cambodia" episode that flew in the face of this memory that was "seared...seared" into his mind. From the Chicago Tribune:

"But the Kerry campaign said the group, Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, is wrong and that Kerry was inside Cambodia to drop off commandos on one mission and was at the border on other occasions."
As Hugh Hewitt suggests,
Now this isn't hard. Kerry's on record claiming at least two cross-border missions --running guns and the CIA man drop off. Douglas Brinkley puts the number of "ferry-man" missions at "three or four." Kerry's critics --which include far more than just the Swift Boat vets, argue that there is zero evidence for any such missions, and that Kerry is lying. So the press should press for the details of the one, two, three or four missions Kerry led and the dates on which he led them. Not one crewmate has substantiated the story of "commando drop offs," CIA hats, or gun-running. Each of these stories appears to be a lie.
Again, there may be many who are willing to dismiss Kerry as unfit simply because he opposed the Vietnam war after he served in it. I am not one of these people. I am deeply indebted to this nation's military for protecting my freedoms. This isn't about Vietnam. It's about the notion that John Kerry appears to have fabricated an entire event, or series of events and is trying to weasel out of the mess he's made by changing the subject to the Jim Rassmann episode. The veracity of the Rassmann episode, which even according the the Post article which "completely discredits" Thurlow, is corroborated by other crewman, Dan Odell and Dick Pease (cited by the Post itself), is completely independent from the veracity of the "Christmas in Cambodia" episode.

Don't get me wrong, Bush's military record is nothing to write home about, but he rarely brings it up at all. I just think that there may be too many eggs in Kerry's Vietnam basket, but we'll have to wait and see.

love it, hate it, there's more of it at pacetown.

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
A letter from the Kerry Campaign
Published: August 20, 2004
Type:
Section: Culture
Writer: Jeremy Chrysler
Jeremy Chrysler's BC Writer page
Jeremy Chrysler's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Jeremy Chrysler
All Culture Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — August 20, 2004 @ 14:28PM — Hal Pawluk [URL]

I saw/heard Thurlow interviewed by Chris Matthews last night on "Hardball."

Thurlow essentially had nothing but opinions about some master "plan" that John Kerry had to become a War Hero and Enter Politics by risking his life under fire.

As to the action report, the Washington Post reporter (Dobbs) who wrote the first story said that it included details about things that happened on other boats so it was not likely that Thurlow's citation was based on Kerry's write-up.

You can find the transcript here, including this:

MATTHEWS: Is it a fair assumption on the part of Mr. Thurlow that it was John Kerry�s words because he was the only one that issued a report, or submitted one, that they would have had to get that information about being under constant enemy fire, automatic weapons fire, et cetera, from the person who filed a report, if no one else did?

DOBBS: I think probably the after-action report could have been the work of several different people, each reporting on what their own boat did. I don't think that all the language in Mr. Thurlow's citation could have come from that after-action report, either. And there were many things that Mr. Thurlow was doing that are mentioned in his citation that John Kerry was not in a position to observe.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/18866)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments