eric...my codes for books aren't posting...durrrrr....srp

fixed - two spaces and a line break after the last one - very temperamental system.

exceptional essay, though the film made me somewhat uneasy, that has little to do with those who see the world differently whether they want to or not

i agree with you about the film -- it was, to me anyway, i felt a degrading portrait of Nash. That it infantilized him a great deal and i had issues iwth that. Alicia was going through this real martyr thing - like her life was so hard, which i don't doubt, but i felt that she really lacked empathy and was more concerned with being seen as the sort of savior madonna -- just my opinion, but i felt it didn't do Nash justice..... interesting that you saw something similar, it sounds...

srp

I have had a strange experience which confirms what you are talking about, of course fear is a natural emotion when your personal autonomy is threathened, I wish I could get hold of Dr. Nash and show him what happened to me, I have incredible personal info on a hrt web site from medical records plus errors in fact,my complaint was accepted by privacy act but then dismissed since they said that the hrt act has a clause which allows them to not correct errors of fact after a decision is made, so it makes me wonder how often this kind of thing happens to people, I have taken 3rd year economics because I didnt give up my seat, sort of like Dr. Nash did, he went back regardless of what he had or what they said, and that is why he is so important as a role model for whatever a person may have or be perceived to have.

I would like to add once you are trapped into having to legitimize yourself to people who are walking away, after projecting negative attributes on to you that aren't even true and then not even have to be accountable for the effect this has on a person's state of mind. This is cited definition of discrimination in disablity case law, but it is a joke, no none cares what the law is. I really think if someone with power looked at my case and saw the way I was mocked when I was trying to fight for my seat, the same way Dr. Nash was mocked, maybe they could help me sue, how can a government body publish something like that about someone knowing it is not true and is harmful, especially when the person is already vulnerable, it is a horrible feeling, to see that up there, the frame is there to make a person appear disfunctional because there is no interaction, I had no hearing, the decision was made, they said I could go to supreme court with if I could get the money or find a lawyer who would talk to me like a normal person and take my case against 3 doctors and the ministry of health services, I have documentation that the facts were wrong or the privacy act would have not originally taken my case. I think the privacy thing or the lack of contributes to the break down too. Of course anyone can break down. Look at New Orleans, once a person is displaced something inside breaks, it is your identity I suppose, once you are accused of a "negative" state of mind it is the same thing. Your identity is taken away, no one takes or interacts with you seriously so how could Dr. Nash progress, it is amazing he went back at all despite it all. That is part is incredible, that is what keeps me going. They stare, that horrible stare, it is real. If people cared about another person's mental health and knew the damage they were doing when they destroy a person's hope to live a normal life. I think anything can go psychotic if it is treated a certain way, it is a form of psychological warfare, to isolate and break down a person. Scary huh??

i just copy your whole essay and pasted it onto miine, LOL!, i just did a project that would've taken 5 hours in 2 minutes LOL! thanks for the help cool sesh.
I NEVER EVEN WATCHED THE MOVIE LOL
it looks reallly boring LOL and i hate mathLOL

I believed that once I was free from temporal lobe epilepsy that times would be better after having been denied opportunity worthy of my capabilities because of my disability and denied support for my disability because of my capability resulting in prolonged poverty and waste of talent through no development of my potential, but although not a prisoner through disability any more I am a prisoner of society with just as many constraints inflicted upon me as I was when disabled since I am over qualified for any assistance in spite of having no experience or financial assets to support myself in 1998 and others who were earning over twice what I was who were under qualified could get some support. Those who are overpaid and incompetent get support, disadvantaged underpaid gifted people get nothing. I am twenty years behind financially and lost fifteen years of my career because of Labour & the DWP and I didn't qualify for any assistance as they make me the scapegoat for their abuse, betrayal, defamation of character, neglect and prejudice.

Blair & Brown say "A fair deal for all and the chance to make the most of one's potential" - who are they trying to bluff? I have never been treated fairly nor had the chance to make the most of my potential so it is not worth me trying now.

While people are granted preference and gain at the expense of others i.e. something which cannot be passed across to all in a fair way, then the reason for those who get preference must be because they are relatively inferior and with Labour in power it reflects the domination by the inferior classes using deception, manipulation, unfairness, cheating - Labour is out to aid the inferior classes and add insult to injury to the disadvantaged gifted.

Disability Allowance is not necessarily an allowance for disability - not in my experience because I was denied it due to my capability whereas many people who aren't disabled but incompetent get it. All I can conclude from this is that having a disability but being denied it because of my intelligence, whereas someone who isn't disabled but has inferior intelligence can get it, then I now see it as 'Inferiority Allowance' where no disability can justify it.

This shows how Labour & the DWP are comforting the inferior and persecuting the superior. For every bit I suffer I will make anyone who inflicts an inferiority on me suffer in return for their negative infliction. I have been involved in many confrontations, arguments, punch ups, etc. over thirty years after being provoked by inferiorists expecting me to suffer for their gains.

I am hated by inferiorists because I can win the arguments on facts and logic whereas they have to use beliefs and assumptions tailored in their way which is often corrupt and try to make small look bigger than big. They may have more money than me but that is because of the help they get - I emphasise I could do some A-level maths before secondary school with no help as I was born a mathematical genius and it is lined to the temporal lobe epilepsy I had. So I have capability which no money or any man made accessory can match. They try to bring me down aggressively but that is because they cannot accept the truth of their relative inferiority. This is my way of persecuting them for their failure to be honest and accept the truth. After all, they try to invert the fact against me to make me scapegoat for their relatively inferiorities.

The only thing which Blair has increased for me is the chance of committing suicide as I am more likely to do this now than ever before, especially as I have been treated worst than a criminal and valued as worthless in spite of having talents and capabilities unique to naturally born geniuses.

I could do some A-level maths before I went to secondary school without any private tuition and had the mental age of an adult before I was a teenager as I was admitted into an adults psychiatric hospital at the age of twelve in 1973 after suffering a nervous breakdown caused by excessive bullying and emotional abuse by local authority staff and pupils. (Yes, Labour stronghold and authorities.)

I have never been able to control my emotions or temper since then and when things go against me or society is tailored to be unfair to me I get very belligerent and disruptive by behaving in accordance with how I am being treated. If I am treated unfairly with everyone else treated better I behave as if I am bottom of the class and behave the worst.

I am not going to try my best when circumstances are grossly unfair since many less intelligent people are above me but act as limitations on my progress because I am beyond their capability and I don't get the recognition I deserve. None of them were born geniuses but are just standing on a higher platform. If I had given to me what they had I would naturally be looking down on them.

But then pretentious idiots in power don't like us do they?

Here is a summary of Labour failures - at local authority level while Conservatives were in power as well as by civil servant when Labour was in power at national level. You will see the localised things linked to the local authority were caused by the labour county council and the civil service failures were when Labour were in power. The four major failures by Labour are as follows:

1. 1973-1974 My secondary education was ruined due to bullying and being taken out of mainstream school and placed in an institution with subnormal children. This was after being admitted into adults' psychiatric hospital at the age of twelve. I lost at least two years and there are some subjects I have no idea in and had I not been gifted and focused on my mathematical talents I would have ended up with no qualifications.

2. 1976 & 1978 In 1976 a welfare officer from the DHSS visited us and knew of my care needs but made an assumption that I wasn't in need of care and didn't get his facts right. In 1978 at the local social security office a civil servant misled me about my entitlements judging me by my capability to overshadow my care needs. These resulted in seventeen years conned out of entitlements.

3. 1985 - 1993 I faced the hurdle of obtaining employment and experienced discrimination. An unscrupulous employer, the local labour county council who was prepared to take me on at school-leaver level, said that if I could prove myself, I would progress. I accepted this as I had no other choice and outperformed many when it came to mathematical and computational work, but my employer used my epilepsy as an excuse to prevent me progressing and not paying me at the level I was performing at. So I started applying for jobs elsewhere, but got nowhere. To find out what my employer was stating about me, I planned with someone to obtain a reference and forward it on to me. My suspicions were true -- my employer didn't credit me worthy of what I was doing but emphasized my so-called inability due to epilepsy, which was defamation of character since epilepsy doesn't cause any mental or physical inabilities. In 1993, I finally decided that I was not going to be held to ransom by this unscrupulous employer and I resigned.

4. 1998 - 2000 After undergoing brain surgery in 1996, which was 100 per cent successful, and by 1998 I was ready to kick-start my career no longer disabled. Due to all the prejudice and lack of experience I went through and my age I had to take on poverty paid jobs worthy of idiots' intelligence. I enquired about doing an Open University course to get another more appropriate degree in order to give me better career opportunities but was turned down for financial assistance because I was over qualified. Yet someone on over twice what I was earning who didn't have any qualifications could get financial support. Hence I haven't had the chance from the State to make the most of my potential.

I have moved on but my employer cannot make up for all the failures of the State and as a result I am not getting the chance to make the most of my potential. I have progressed a bit more than in the past but this is in line with someone of slightly higher than average intelligence, not a gifted person.

I have never been treated fairly or had the chance to make the most of my potential with Labour as they use my capability to deny me everything I should have had for my disadvantages and my disability to deny me everything I should have had for my capability.

Just read what shortage of talent there is and authorities waste high potential of ones like us. Governments only have themselves to blame for failing to recognise it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The world's most valuable commodity is getting harder to find

The Economist has published a special report on talent. In modern business, talent has become a synonym for brainpower and the ability to think creatively, both of huge importance in the modern economy.

As The Economist's report shows, there is a huge concern in the business world that there is not enough talent to go around, that companies are battling for the worlds best employees and that once they have found them, they fight like hell to keep them.

The Economist points to evidence that the talent shortage is likely to get worse. Nobody really disputes the idea that the demand for talent-intensive skills is rising - in America the proportion of workers doing jobs that call for complex skills has grown three times as fast as employment in general. As other economies move in the same direction, the global demand is rising quickly. As for supply, in much of the developed world the working population is predicted to fall. Even in still growing America, the imminent retirement of the baby-boomers means that companies will lose large numbers of experienced workers in a short space of time.

To add to these woes, companies have seen a collapse of loyalty amongst their employees and most Western countries are not producing enough scientists, engineers or workers skilled to work in a modern economy. Again, in India and China they are suffering from acute skills shortages at the more sophisticated end of their economies.

The Economist points to the different challenges this shortage will pose for companies, governments and individuals -

For companies the main task is simply to end up with more talented people than their competitors. Human-resource managers, once second tier figures, now often rank among the highest paid people at American firms; they will have to justify that status.

Governments will need to act now. They need to remove barriers to help the flow of highly skilled workers and concentrate on education so that schools and universities produce more talent for the future.

Individuals should also be aware that the hunt for talent is bound to create even greater inequality. A global meritocracy is in all our interests, says The Economist. Be prepared to fight for it.

Source - Onrec