<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Real reduces price, ups ante against Apple</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2004 19:47:11 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/18/020251.php#comment-80250</link>
<description>If you want a crappy experience, but without the DRM, why don&#039;t you sign up at emusic.com. They don&#039;t offer ala carte, but you get unrestricted MP3 files and they have a great catalogue. You pay a flat fee for a certain amount of tracks (which is where it is stupid).

Except for their business model, they are doing things right.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">80250@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2004 19:47:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/18/020251.php#comment-80243</link>
<description>I am not getting any downloads from Real because I use a Mac.  But, I checked my PayPal account today and I am am getting &lt;b&gt;bills&lt;/b&gt; from Real. They&#039;ve tried to charge amounts from $1.00 to $9.95 on a dozen occassions for a two-week period.  (Since I signed up and downloaded the player.)  I actually don&#039;t owe them a cent.  Proceed with caution.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">80243@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2004 19:20:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/18/020251.php#comment-80232</link>
<description>All Real has to do to make their tunes work with iPod is strip out the DRM entirely. Problem solved.

This squabbling over incompatible DRM is just bullshit. What about &lt;b/&gt;me&lt;/b&gt; the person who is shelling out money for vaporware, it turns out, I don&#039;t even own.

Screw both of them.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">80232@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2004 18:07:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/18/020251.php#comment-80212</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;MacNewsWorld&lt;/i&gt; has an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macnewsworld.com/story/35907.html&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; that does a good job of explaining the legal and practical issues involved in the Real-Apple controversy.  I am still leaning toward Real&#039;s side from a legal perspective.   DRM is meant to protect producers of music, not resellers in my opinion.   If it can be changed without depriving producers of protection, I am not convinced the DMCA has been violated.  Real&#039;s weaknesses are with practicality and taste.  If Apple &#039;fixes&#039; the iPod so it doesn&#039;t work with Real&#039;s online music store, all of Real&#039;s efforts will have been wasted.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">80212@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:07:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>