If life begins at conception, then death begins at birth
Published August 16, 2004
Scientists are in agreement that Bush's policy is succeeding. Stem cell research has been drastically slowed. Yet Bush surrogates now pretend that the policy's real success is its failure to stop this research completely. Hey! You're supposed to think all those embryos being used in privately funded research are human victims, remember? It's a huge tragedy, remember? Stop bragging about it.
In a display of her husband's famous compassionate conservatism, Laura Bush scolded that "it really isn't fair to people who are watching a loved one suffer" to overplay the promise of stem cells. She said, helpfully, "We don't know that stem cell research will provide cures for anything."
As someone with a loved one (myself, as it happens) who has the disease (Parkinson's) for which stem cells hold the most promise, please allow me to say: Thank you so much, Mrs. Bush, for trying to make sure that I don't get too hopeful. While your husband and Sen. John Kerry make a major issue out of who is more optimistic, it is inspiring to have a first lady with the courage to say: Let's be pessimistic! Optimism is unfair! [Washington Post] The problem for Bush is that any give on the "life begins at conception" mantra is perceived as a step toward accepting the moral legitimacy of abortion, just as the radical pro-choice feel any restrictions on abortion is likewise a slippery slope toward back alley abortions by drunken veterinarians with rusty scalpels. A modicum of common sense would improve the postions of each extreme.
More on stem cell research and policy here, here, here, and here.
- If life begins at conception, then death begins at birth
- Published: August 16, 2004
- Type:
- Section: Sci/Tech
- Filed Under: Sci/Tech: Science
- Writer: Eric Olsen
- Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
- Eric Olsen's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
thanks Hal, I appreciate it, because man, you do not kiss ass
Of course the promise of a research breakthrough is what keeps many people who are suffering from neurological diseases or spinal cord injuries going from day to day, Christopher Reeve and Michael J. Fox just being two of the more visible examples of this. If I were suffering from such an affliction, I would prefer an unrealistic hope to no hope at all.
Quote:
In a display of her husband's famous compassionate conservatism, Laura Bush scolded that "it really isn't fair to people who are watching a loved one suffer" to overplay the promise of stem cells. She said, helpfully, "We don't know that stem cell research will provide cures for anything."
She did? really? In the name of compassion, let's not research hope (well, maybe a little, so we can brag about it)....
But well, I believe my beloved country has also outpolicied it for the most part. So I'll not shout to loudly, untill I can vote once more.
Good post though







Thanks (perhaps especially for the appeal to common sense - we could use more of that in a whole lot of areas today).