Alien vs. Predator

Written by Dave Hill
Published August 13, 2004
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4

  • The sfx were also decent, if uninspired. The pyramid was fabulous. The CG Aliens were a bit less so — some nice poses in some places, less so in others. And the "Eliza crossing the ice" flight through the whaling village toward the end — just didn't quite gel. The CG and overlays were too obvious.

  • Why does some Predator equipment get eaten away by the Alien acid, and other bits don't? If there was a reason, it escaped me, which made me think it was poor writing.

  • Acting-wise, it was a decent enough cast. Lance Henriksen as Charles Bishop Weyland was a bit of a poor man's George C. Scott, but cruised along nicely nonetheless; whatever the spottiness of Weyland's motivation probably can be blamed on the ankle-deep cutting room floor. Sanaa Lathan as the protagonist Alexa Woods is no Sigourney Weaver, but she does a decent enough job with what she is given. Raoul Bova as Italian archaeologist Sebastian de Rosa doesn't give me any reason to look up his other movies (more on his character below).

    Ewen Bremmer is, to be sure, a lot of fun as geeky Scotsman Graeme Miller. His immediate lovability should be a sure sign that he's doomed to die horribly, and the writer definitely drags that doom out over a couple of scenes.

    The rest of the cast is visibly distinct and each person gets a line or two to establish their character. But they are too quickly swept away like leaves in a firestorm, including, alas, the cute Vasquez analog, played by Agathe De La Boulaye.

  • Original music by Harald Kloser. Um .. was there music? I guess there was. Certainly nothing that distinguished itself. Some vaguely Aliens-like riffs, but that was about it.

  • The Italian archaeologist is without a doubt the most annoyingly expositional character I've encountered for a while. He makes huge leaps of understanding, and then tells us all about stuff he couldn't possibly know. I don't believe that Aztec numbering was Base 10, and I'm pretty certain they had a lunar calendar, meaning his instant translation of today's date is something a bit less than believable. (Indeed, it was, ironically, the least believable bit in the movie.) He tells instead of shows, and serves as a short-hand way for the audience to understand what's going on, somehow.

    page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
  • Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
    Alien vs. Predator
    Published: August 13, 2004
    Type:
    Section: Video
    Filed Under: Video: SF
    Writer: Dave Hill
    Dave Hill's BC Writer page
    Dave Hill's personal site
    Spread the Word
    Like this article?
    Email this
    Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
    RSS Feeds
    All RSS Feeds (240+)
    Comments on this article
    BC articles by Dave Hill
    Video: SF
    All Video Articles
    All BC articles
    All BC Comments

    Comments

    #1 — August 13, 2004 @ 08:37AM — Eric Olsen

    very fine job Dave, great to have you back, thanks!

    #2 — August 13, 2004 @ 09:58AM — jadester [URL]

    you do of course realise, that there is a whole series of Aliens Vs Predator novels and comics?
    I'm not sure if the plot of the film closely follows any of these in particular, and as you'd expect there is a fair amonut of "duds" in the group, but equally there are some pretty good stories to be had.

    #3 — August 13, 2004 @ 10:36AM — *** Dave [URL]

    I'm not only aware of it, I even make reference to it in the first paragraph.

    While there may very well be some very good AvP comics/novels out there, I don't believe that the impetus to produce them, or this film, was the desire to make great literature. It was more, "Predators vs Aliens -- would that be cool, or what?!"

    There's nothing wrong with that (or with cross-overs in general -- I particularly liked a Walt Simonson-drawn Robocop vs Terminators series, of the same ilk). One can certainly tell good stories that way. And there are elements of this film that certainly qualify -- like I said, I'm happy I went to see it, and think I'll probably pick up the DVD.

    But it's not a great movie, or even (IMO) a great sf/action movie. Aliens, at least, was better. That it's fair-to-good is nothing to sneeze at, esp. since I think most people are expecting less of it than that.

    #4 — August 13, 2004 @ 11:30AM — Tom Johnson [URL]

    From what little I've read from fans of the comics and films, PWS Anderson has basically destroyed both franchises with this one - taking little bits here and there that he liked out of each one and ignoring everything else that didn't suit his needs, like the Alien lifecycle (I hear that someone gets face-hugged and minutes later a chestburster appears. It's always been an un-listed amount of time, but seemingly several days, and then the creature runs off to mature for a couple of days.)

    I'm a huge fan of the Alien franchise, not so much of Predator, but I think I'm holding off on this one until the DVD - especially if it'll contain extra footage.

    #5 — August 30, 2004 @ 01:58AM — jon

    the part where she kills an alien and gets 'marked' for her efforts is lifted out of an AvP novel from some years back. well, in that novel, at least the predators brought the female protagonist (she was asian in the book i think; japanese, if i remember correctly) to the predator homeworld where she was accepted because she had the mark of the warrior that the predator whom she fought the aliens with, had given her.

    come to think of it, the novel had the same premise as well: pesky humans occupying and setting up base on a planet used for the predator's hunting.

    oh well.

    was her name machinko in the novel? somehow that name comes to mind.

    Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

    Add your comment, speak your mind

    (Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/18603)

    Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





    Remember Name/URL?

    Please preview your comment!

    Fresh
    Articles
    Fresh
    Comments