<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on <em>Tron 2.0</em></title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:39:50 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by jadester</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/11/085338.php#comment-79265</link>
<description>actually, although i may well get people arguing against me about this, FPSes that add RPG elements don&#039;t really add all that much to the play experience either.  the reason is because they try to give the player far more freedom (Deus Ex, I&#039;m looking at *you*), but unfortunately the average pc gamer&#039;s setup just doesn&#039;t have the clout to run an FPS that really has a good level of freedom of gameplay.  This then leads to the realisation that actually the game you&#039;re playing is not much less restrictive than a standard fully-on-rails FPS, and through this, disappointment.
The best game, freedom-wise, that i have played so far is GTA 3 but there&#039;s still a long way to go.  Hopefully, though, the technology will continue advancing at near-light speed and so it won&#039;t be that many more years before we see truly immersive games.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79265@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:39:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>