<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on The Picasso Scam...</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:53:45 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Shark</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/10/094118.php#comment-79053</link>
<description>BTW, folks:

The Robert Descharnes book of Dali works is a helluva deal at $40!

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79053@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:53:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Shark</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/10/094118.php#comment-79052</link>
<description>...making the point that you should buy art because you like it. 

At this point in the game, anyone who buys art for an &quot;investment&quot; is nuts.

And buying from a &#039;reputable&#039; auction house or gallery does little to insure proper provenance. It behooves those firms to believe what they want to believe when it comes to authenticity and attribution.

But there&#039;s a sucker born every minute.


</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79052@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:52:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>