<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Song of the day: Deep Purple - Highway Star</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 22:21:05 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/233746.php#comment-79173</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;Parts of &quot;Born Again&quot; do veer into Spinal Tap territory, though.&lt;/i&gt;

yea, &quot;Stone Henge&quot;...eeeeck</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79173@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 22:21:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tim Hall</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/233746.php#comment-79136</link>
<description>&quot;Trashed&quot; off the same album isn&#039;t bad.  Parts of &quot;Born Again&quot; do veer into Spinal Tap territory, though.

More seriously, I&#039;ll have to be boringly conventional and rate &quot;Machine Head&quot; as their best, just pipping &quot;Burn&quot; and the 1984 comeback album &quot;Perfect Strangers&quot;.  I think &quot;In Rock&quot; has dated badly.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79136@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:39:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/233746.php#comment-79134</link>
<description>I do like Burn a lot, by the way, very bluesy, best Coverdale ever</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79134@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:31:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/233746.php#comment-79114</link>
<description>my favorite Deep Purple song is &quot;Disturbing The Priest&quot;.

...except that it&#039;s really a Black Sabbath song with Ian Gillan singing.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79114@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:48:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Douglas Mays</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/233746.php#comment-79113</link>
<description>all I can say is that maybe Deep Purple wasn&#039;t history&#039;s most definitive rock band.  But they were good enuf to be their own drug.  &quot;yeah, I feel like smokin&#039; some Deep Purple.  We smoked that Stones last night man, Do Purple tonight&quot;  If you want Deep Purple, you gotta get the real stuff.

So, give them points for having the abiliuty to be selected over the rest of my album collection.   And, as I see Deep Purple footage sometimes on VH1 Classics, They are holding out well in the &quot;time honored&quot; catagory.  Sounds pretty damn good sometimes.  Wouldn&#039;t recommend drinkin&#039; it everynite.

peaceloveguidance</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79113@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:47:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/233746.php#comment-79112</link>
<description>my favorite DP song is actually &quot;Woman From Tok-ay-o&quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79112@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:40:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by JR</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/233746.php#comment-79110</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;whether it&#039;s their best or not, it&#039;s their definitive, career highlight album&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s hard to argue with here in the U.S.  Though from what I&#039;ve read, &lt;i&gt;In Rock&lt;/i&gt; seems to have made a bigger impact in Britain.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79110@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:38:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Douglas Mays</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/233746.php#comment-79109</link>
<description>I&#039;m a long follower of Deep Purple.  When BURN came out, that was the end of DP as we knew them.  I always wondered how far they could make it into the mid-70s blah world of music.  They did OK.

Oh, good to take notice to Jon Lord, keyboards.  How about his intro to LAZY?!  Him and Keith Emerson could go head to head in the abuse the B-3 contest.

plg</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79109@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:38:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/233746.php#comment-79104</link>
<description>actually, i have a hard time comparing Machine Head to Burn because i&#039;m not a big coverdale fan.

it&#039;s not that the music is &#039;bad&#039; or anything...it&#039;s just that it has a different feel to it.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79104@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:25:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/233746.php#comment-79103</link>
<description>whether it&#039;s their &lt;i&gt;best&lt;/i&gt; or not, it&#039;s their definitive, career highlight album</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79103@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:25:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by JR</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/233746.php#comment-79102</link>
<description>Not saying &lt;i&gt;Machine Head&lt;/i&gt;&#039;s shortcomings keep it from being a great album; it&#039;s just not Deep Purple&#039;s best.  Maybe second best (excluding live albums).  Arguably fourth or fifth best... a matter of taste, I suppose.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79102@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:17:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/233746.php#comment-79100</link>
<description>c&#039;mon...everybody was stoned out of their freakin gourds back then.

what&#039;s sound quality got to do with it?

lighten up!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79100@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:04:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by SFC SKI</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/233746.php#comment-79099</link>
<description>&quot;Machine Head is a collection of great riffs and solos, silly lyrics and not terribly melodic singing, recorded with rather poor sound quality.&quot;

Well, if I remember correctly, DP had gone to Montreaux, on the Lake Geneva shoreline, making the record with a mobile recording lab, but they did not have much time, that might explain the sound quality.  All in all, it was a great rockin&#039; album.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79099@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:00:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by JR</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/233746.php#comment-79096</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;Burn&lt;/i&gt; is Deep Purple&#039;s best album.  &lt;i&gt;Machine Head&lt;/i&gt; is a collection of great riffs and solos, silly lyrics and not terribly melodic singing, recorded with rather poor sound quality.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79096@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:34:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/233746.php#comment-79083</link>
<description>Um, tut tut.

So anyway, &lt;i&gt;Made In Japan&lt;/i&gt; has the definitive &quot;Smoke On the Water&quot; - 11 comments and no one mentions this elemental nugget of truth?? &lt;i&gt;Made&lt;/i&gt; is essentially &lt;i&gt;Machine Head&lt;/i&gt; live, which is the band&#039;s best album in the best possible Nihongo-frenzied setting.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79083@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:31:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by HW Saxton Jr.</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/233746.php#comment-79081</link>
<description>Furthermore Duane,my post DOES address
your statement about my comments in
regard to &quot;Highway Star&quot;. Something you
failed to note in your much too witty
riposte. Lighten Up Francis, jeeezus.



</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79081@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:29:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by HW Saxton Jr.</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/233746.php#comment-79076</link>
<description>Duane,First off I was just goofing a bit
on this.Second, if I WAS being sarcastic
you would know it.I do not give a fuck!
about this enough to really give it too
much energy.

I already do have a girlfriend thank you
very much. As for the grammatical gaffe,
eh lalalalalalala. This isn&#039;t a thesis,
a term paper or an article.I don&#039;t care.
YOU&#039;VE taken that post way outta context
Duane.

PS: Superior Attitude? Hardly.Are you in
the throes of an inferiority complex ???
On a good day I&#039;d consider myself about
as bright as a small appliance bulb.On a
bad day my Doberman pinscher can beat my
ass at Chess.Your personal attack on me
is really bitter and very distasteful.
Seriously.Wow,unmuthafuckinbelieveable.




 </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79076@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:21:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Duane</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/233746.php#comment-79070</link>
<description>Look, Mr. HW Saxton Junior, can the sarcasm and your superior above-it-all attitude. What&#039;s with the &quot;Good Sir&quot; crap? And it&#039;s &quot;King&#039;s English,&quot; not &quot;Kings English.&quot; The King&#039;s English actually includes proper apostrophization. Do you know about that? I believe that the subject of this post was the song &quot;Highway Star.&quot; If you have a problem with my comments on the song, you may disagree. But don&#039;t presume to tell me what I can or can&#039;t say, you, with your three exclamation marks. A little excitable, are we? Why are you trying to overanalyze my comment? Calm down, Junior, and find yourself a girlfriend. Sounds like you a need an outlet for all that pent up hostility.

And to SFC SKI, good point. The keyboards were an integral part of the overall sound and feel to the song.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79070@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 13:34:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by HW Saxton Jr.</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/233746.php#comment-79064</link>
<description>Duane,Good sir my statement that Ritchie
was &quot;going apeshit mad&quot; was only meant
to imply that he was playing at quite a
high energy level. Not actually primate
poop flinging insane. Please pardon my
etymological &quot;ghettofication&quot; of the
Kings English. 

Besides I stand by statement vehemently.
On the version of &quot;Highway Star&quot; I have
from a Deep Purple show in Stockholm up
there in Sweden, Ritchie is indeed going
wild.Barely controlled feedback, serious
Whammy bar abuse &amp; volume swells pepper
his solo on &quot;Highway Star&quot;. 

And quit being soooooooooooooooo damned
scienfuggintific!!! Over analysis takes
the fun out of lifes simple joys, amigo.
No need to analyze a great meal,a good
fuck or a rockin&#039; guitar solo.They just
is or they just ain&#039;t.

Peace Love and Marshall Stacks, HW.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79064@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 13:00:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by SFC SKI</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/233746.php#comment-78976</link>
<description>How can you mention Blackmore&#039;s fantastic solo and not even give a nod to Jon Lord&#039;s incredible synth solo on the same song?  

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78976@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 02:51:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Douglas Mays</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/233746.php#comment-78880</link>
<description>Highway Star is definately a favorite in the Deep Purple catalog for me.

I love what they do to other people&#039;s songs also.  &#039;Kentucky Woman&#039; (Niel Diamond) is such a great interpretation by DP

peaceloveguidance</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78880@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Aug 2004 19:36:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Duane</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/233746.php#comment-78843</link>
<description>OK, I stand corrected. Thanks, JR.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78843@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Aug 2004 15:01:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by JR</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/233746.php#comment-78837</link>
<description>Which version are we talking about?  The studio version of &quot;Highway Star&quot; was all worked out; it is one of the rare occasions when Blackmore double-tracked a solo.  Later, in live performances, he got progressively farther away from what he played on record.  As I remember, the version from the BBC &quot;In Concert&quot; recording is fairly close to the studio version.  But by the time of the Japanese tour in Aug. &#039;72, he was pretty much just going apeshit.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78837@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:52:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Duane</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/233746.php#comment-78833</link>
<description>Blackmore&#039;s solo on Highway Star is one of the more famous solos in rock music. He is not &quot;going apeshit mad,&quot; but is in complete control. It is precise. It&#039;s the kind of solo that should be played note for note live, to the extent that that&#039;s possible. Remember that there are two guitars doing the solo. Blackmore is harmonizing with himself, which is part of what gives this solo a distinctive sound. Again, that requires precision, not apeshitness. I think what made that song such a grabber is the driving bass line and Ian&#039;s vocals, not the guitar parts. It has a good beat and all the kids seemed to enjoy dancing to it. I give it an 85.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78833@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:07:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by HW Saxton Jr.</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/233746.php#comment-78828</link>
<description>I&#039;ve gotta agree with Mark S. that the
lyrics are kinda dorky.Of course the use
of automobiles as a sexual metaphpor is
nothing new.Check out &quot;Terraplane Blues&quot;
by Robert Johnson or &quot;My Little Machine&quot;
by Sonny Boy Williamson #1 for example.
Just substitute &quot;big fine ass&quot; for &quot;big
fat tires&quot; blah blah blah. Still it&#039;s a
great driving song and Blackmore is just
going apeshit mad on the solo. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78828@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Aug 2004 13:39:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>