<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on FOUR MORE YEARS OF HELL? LET'S CHECK THE STAR CHART.</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2004 09:32:38 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by your mom</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/015815.php#comment-95606</link>
<description>so what bush is a total faggot fucking bastard, who should burn in hell!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">95606@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2004 09:32:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by JR</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/015815.php#comment-80164</link>
<description>Is &quot;John F***ing Kerry&quot; supposed to be an insult?  &#039;Cause it kinda makes him sound like a badass dude.  Maybe it&#039;s intended as irony...?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">80164@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:32:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/015815.php#comment-80140</link>
<description>rj, known for his descriptions of &quot;john f*ing kerry&quot;, uses the word &lt;i&gt;civility&lt;/i&gt;.

all blogcritics will now step aside so as to avoid the oncoming lightning bolt.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">80140@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2004 09:18:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by RJ</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/015815.php#comment-80075</link>
<description>...and after calling for more civility in politics, and then lying about what I said...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">80075@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2004 22:18:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dan</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/015815.php#comment-80065</link>
<description>I would probably say &quot;stick it&quot; first.  But only when I&#039;m not having class.  Definitely not when I&#039;m a prospective first lady, on the record, with reporters.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">80065@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2004 21:15:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Robert T DeMarco</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/015815.php#comment-80059</link>
<description>You really have to laugh at some of the comments.  I find those about her being some kind of left wing nut particularly interesting given the Republicans asked her to run for her deceased husbands Senate seat.

Frankly, I find the words &quot;shove it&quot; as a sign of class. I doubt many of us utter the words &quot;shove it&quot; when we are upset.

Bob</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">80059@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:48:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by david</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/015815.php#comment-79181</link>
<description>she&#039;s an intelligent, strong woman with serious views -- can you imagine anything more threatening to the wacky social conservative right?  it&#039;s really quite wonderful</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79181@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 23:35:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by copygodd</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/015815.php#comment-78815</link>
<description>when i said she&#039;s a nutcase, i meant it in a loving way. i find her to be quite interesting, and a breath of fresh air in terms of recent first ladies. 

i heard a clip of her &quot;four more years of hell&quot; line, and thought it was funny as hell. 

however, in terms of nuttiness, her mouth is nothing compared to nancy&#039;s belief in astrology. 

it seems to me that if THK is all the talk-shows have to rant about right now, they must be running out of substantive issues to focus on. &quot;forget about kerry&#039;s record and stands on the various issues...how &#039;bout that nutty wife of his?&quot; 

if that&#039;s the best they&#039;ve got, i think kerry just may pull this off. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78815@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Aug 2004 11:46:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Hal Pawluk</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/015815.php#comment-78808</link>
<description>The technique on this issue seems to have precedent:

&quot;Repeat a lie a thousand times and it becomes the truth ...&quot; - usually credited to Dr Joseph Goebbels, Propaganda Minister of the Third Reich</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78808@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Aug 2004 10:00:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Hal Pawluk</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/015815.php#comment-78806</link>
<description>If you think that THK is a nut job, RJ, you must think Cheney is a total berserker.

Don&#039;t you people have anything real to talk about?
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78806@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Aug 2004 09:53:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by RJ</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/015815.php#comment-78751</link>
<description>&quot;The nut jobs are on the right.&quot;

Hal, the nut jobs are everywhere. Left, Right, whatever.

THK, sadly, is one of them. And she may be our next First Lady. (shudder)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78751@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Aug 2004 00:28:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Hal Pawluk</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/015815.php#comment-78727</link>
<description>Didn&#039;t you see the clips of THK using the word &quot;hell&quot; in response to hecklers?

Clearly it&#039;s not a belief in the way that Nancy Reagan truly believes in astrology, or John Aschroft truly believes that once Israel has all the land of Zion, Armageddon will occur and he&#039;ll go to heaven but I (and probably you) won&#039;t.

The nut jobs are on the right.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78727@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Aug 2004 20:13:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by copygodd</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/015815.php#comment-78715</link>
<description>she is a total nutcase. i just don&#039;t think it matters. in the grand scheme of things, the first lady is even more irrelevant than the vice-president. and if  the republicans weren&#039;t upset about nancy&#039;s astrologer, they really should back off about teresa&#039;s mouth. besides, saying &quot;four more years of hell&quot; is nowhere near as bad as the veep telling another senator to go &quot;fuck himself.&quot; and everyone just laughed that off as dick being dick. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78715@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Aug 2004 14:54:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by RJ</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/08/015815.php#comment-78683</link>
<description>She&#039;s an unglued kook who believes the US is presently in &quot;hell&quot; and thinks her boy-toy war-criminal husband can lead us into a period of higher taxes, pandering to anti-American Frenchmen, and still defeat terrorists who are in Iraq.

She IS a campaign issue. She has made herself such, by her frequent outbursts. 

She&#039;s a billionaire, foeign-born kook who says outrageous things and then immediately denies saying them, telling people to &quot;shove it&quot; while demanding that political life not stoop to such a level.

She marries Senators (yes, that&#039;s plural) and then pretends to speak the &quot;little people&quot; in an informed manner.

THK is not up to the job of First Lady. Such a position requires a modicum of grace and basic human decency. She is clearly left wanting.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78683@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Aug 2004 02:31:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>