<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Justification for Abortion</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2004 05:53:58 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Bob A. Booey</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/07/084515.php#comment-79213</link>
<description>Justene, I have a very serious question.

Do you ever wear thongs? Just wondering if our censor is uptight.

RJ: why would you fully support censorship when you were once banned? I don&#039;t really understand that from you.

That is all.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79213@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2004 05:53:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by RJ</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/07/084515.php#comment-79202</link>
<description>*editing them?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79202@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2004 01:49:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by RJ</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/07/084515.php#comment-79201</link>
<description>Justene:

Why wasn&#039;t my comment (actually, &lt;i&gt;comments&lt;/i&gt;) merely [edited]?

Why were they erased entirely?

I have fully supported your tenure here as Comment Czar, but why are you now completely &lt;b&gt;erasing&lt;/b&gt; comments instead of merely edited them?

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79201@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2004 01:47:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Justene</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/07/084515.php#comment-79200</link>
<description>Rj, don&#039;t repost the comment.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79200@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2004 01:18:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Shark</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/07/084515.php#comment-79168</link>
<description>re: Paris Hilton and that little monkey-faced girlfriend of hers -

More arguments for post-partum abortions.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79168@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:14:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Justene</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/07/084515.php#comment-79149</link>
<description>Having watched now 2 seasons of simple life, it seems to me that Nicole always said &quot;that&#039;s hot&quot; and Paris only did it once in a while to humor her.  It also seemed to me that Nicole did everything annoying.  If I was Paris&#039; parents, I&#039;d talk to her about that Nicole.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79149@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 19:52:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bob A. Booey</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/07/084515.php#comment-79148</link>
<description>And as Chris Rock says, if you pick up a chick at Planned Parenthood, you know she puts out.

Blame Chris Rock, not me.

That is all.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79148@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 19:51:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bob A. Booey</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/07/084515.php#comment-79147</link>
<description>I&#039;m joking, of course. 

But I&#039;m very serious about now referring to everything as &quot;hot.&quot; It&#039;s something I&#039;m going to make a point of after meeting countless young women this past weekend who now insist on dressing and talking like Paris Hilton, with nothing to say about anything other than &quot;That&#039;s hot.&quot; As horribly annoying as that is, I still gave it to em fortissimo, though, you know what I&#039;m sayin? Know what I&#039;m sayin?

Anyway, don&#039;t talk about politics, folks. Let&#039;s just say everything&#039;s hot.

Loves it! That is all.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79147@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 19:49:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dawn</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/07/084515.php#comment-79125</link>
<description>I lived in West Virginia, but I am not sure if that is a good thing for the state or a bad thing.

As for abortion being &quot;hot&quot; - what do you mean?  That is a very confusing and kind of disturbing statement.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79125@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:57:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bob A. Booey</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/07/084515.php#comment-79120</link>
<description>The father of the baby is Charles Grainer, the specialist who was the alleged ringleader of the prison abuse. You might remember him as the big guy with the thick coke-bottle glasses in those pictures and also as the co-star of pornographic pictures taken with Ms. England. You can only imagine what a sociopath that child has the potential to be with those two as parents.

Abortion&#039;s hot.

That is all.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79120@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:06:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by HW Saxton Jr.</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/07/084515.php#comment-79066</link>
<description>And also the pride of Boone County,W.VA
the inimitable Hasil Adkins !!!


</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79066@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 13:03:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by JR</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/07/084515.php#comment-79055</link>
<description>Not to mention Chuck Yeager, Johnnie Johnson (as in &quot;Johnnie B. Goode&quot;), Don Knotts, Brad Paisley, and John Nash.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79055@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:11:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/07/084515.php#comment-79036</link>
<description>on the other hand, Jerry West and Jennifer Garner are from West Virginia</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79036@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:38:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by kathyc</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/07/084515.php#comment-79033</link>
<description>Sharky, you&#039;re spot on as usual!
Keep fighting the good fight.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">79033@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:24:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Shark</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/07/084515.php#comment-78699</link>
<description>Ironically, some of the anti-abortionists are arguments for abortion -- and the &#039;creationism&#039; crowd is a definite example of evolutionary throwbacks and tiny brains.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78699@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Aug 2004 10:57:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Vern Halen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/07/084515.php#comment-78696</link>
<description>I read somewhere that one of the arguments against abortion is that some who deserved to live die instead. Using that same logic, some who deserve to die live instead. So, in order to remedy that, maybe what we need is retroactive abortion.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78696@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Aug 2004 09:04:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by RJ</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/07/084515.php#comment-78654</link>
<description>I think the only reason skanks like Ms. England join the military is the disproportionate male-to-female ratio. They figure they&#039;ll have young, athletic men vigorously competing for their affections. Sadly, the above photograph is evidence that this is true...   :-/</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78654@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 7 Aug 2004 22:18:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Shark</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/07/084515.php#comment-78645</link>
<description>Dawn, good call on the Camos. 

BTW: When the American Army has pregnancy camo uniforms available, you KNOW we&#039;re fucked.

Yet another sign of The End Times.


</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78645@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 7 Aug 2004 20:17:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by BB</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/07/084515.php#comment-78641</link>
<description>Sharky - get that tongue out of your cheek son ;-).</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78641@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 7 Aug 2004 19:31:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by HW Saxton Jr.</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/07/084515.php#comment-78619</link>
<description>I think we should take up a collection
and buy her a prosthetic chin.
 </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78619@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 7 Aug 2004 15:15:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dawn</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/07/084515.php#comment-78601</link>
<description>post partum for sure - she certainly does little to improve the impression people have of West Virginia.

Oh, and just fo the record camo does very little to hide that pregancy weight gain.  Sheesh, try black next time, it can be very slimming!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78601@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 7 Aug 2004 11:57:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/07/084515.php#comment-78596</link>
<description>sounds like situational ethics</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78596@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 7 Aug 2004 11:12:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dirtgrain</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/07/084515.php#comment-78590</link>
<description>I can&#039;t argue with that.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78590@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 7 Aug 2004 10:40:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>