Review: Collateral

Written by Screen Rant
Published August 06, 2004
page 1 | 2

I can see why Cruise chose to do this film: Vincent is not a caricatured "bad guy". Sure, he's a sociopath, but he has moments where he shows he's got a tiny bit of humanity left when he helps out Max on more than one occasion. He also has his own personal Nietzschean philosophy which he seems to be eager to share. His point of view is very defeatist, yet pragmatic, and he actually brings some enlightenment to Max, although not in the manner he intended. Cruise's Vincent is actually quite personable until he starts filling you with bullet holes. He slips into the role quite comfortably, and I never for a moment thought "Hey, that's Tom Cruise, he's supposed to be the good guy".

Foxx was also effective as a mellow guy who just doesn't want any trouble, but who is pushed further and further and is willing to step beyond his personality when he sees that the situation is not going to get better any time soon. He's certainly come a long way from In Living Color, and he's much more believable in a serious role than say, Jim Carrey, who in contrast seems to ooze sincerity to the point that it doesn't look sincere.

The movie worked well, giving us time to get to know the characters with extended scenes, instead of cutting back and forth in a choppy manner to indicate things happening simultaenously. There is more than one way to show that, and it was done well here, so props to the editor. However if you're an adrenaline junkie who walks out of a movie thinking it was lame because the music wasn't blaring and the movie wasn't a two hour long action sequence, you might be disappointed.

Michael Mann has done well once again, and seems to be on the short list of consistently good directors. The movie probably could have lost about 3 or 4 minutes about 3/4 of the way through to pick up the pacing, but beyond that, it is a great film.

Visit ScreenRant.com for more movie reviews and commentary without the sugar coating.

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Review: Collateral
Published: August 06, 2004
Type:
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Crime, Video: Drama, Video: Thriller
Writer: Screen Rant
Screen Rant's BC Writer page
Screen Rant's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Screen Rant
Video: Crime
Video: Drama
Video: Thriller
All Video Articles
Screen Rant's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — August 6, 2004 @ 17:14PM — visualsimplicity [URL]

I enjoyed this film too. Tom Cruise was quite menacing sometimes as a villian, especially at the moment that he jumped onto the train. He pulled it off quite well.

I also loved how a lot of things just happened through pure chance. As you mentioned, the whole situation could have been avoided if he had daydreamed a little longer, or if Vincent hadn't heard him call out. A fleeting moment was all it took. Such is life.

It goes full circle very well too.

#2 — August 6, 2004 @ 17:24PM — Vic [URL]

Yup. There was that one big coincidence, but hey, if the overall movie is well done I can cut it some slack here and there.

Vic

#3 — August 7, 2004 @ 00:43AM — visualsimplicity [URL]

Well, I didn't mean the big coincidence as the full circle, that was sort of predictable and a tad weak, but anyway. I actually meant the train thing, if you know what I mean. Now that was well done.

#4 — August 7, 2004 @ 00:45AM — Vic [URL]

Oh! Yes. Classic. :-)

Vic

#5 — August 7, 2004 @ 02:52AM — Triniman

4/5

The premise sounds pretty dull, doesn't it? Tom Cruise plays a hit man who coerces a cab driver to drive him around LA to knock off five people. Jamie Foxx portrays the reluctant cab driver. Director Michael Mann proves that a compelling drama doesn't require an excess in plot, car chases or violence or humour. Much of the film takes place in the cab with Cruise and Foxx exchanging philosophies of life, goals and dreams. Foxx, a cabbie for 12 years, wants to save up to open a limo service. Cruise is more enigmatic about his past, but instead is a relentless, cold-blooded assassin. Still, he's not one-dimensional at all.

Cruise is excellent as the laser-focused killer with taste. Witness the scene in the jazz club to see how good his taste in music is. He's not cocky like the mastermind bad guy in the first Die Hard, but he is cool, confident and obviously emotionally detached from his victims. He doesn't care who they are since he's just doing his job. He also doesn't flash the million-dollar Cruise movie star smile.

Jamie Foxx also performs well as the uncomfortable cabbie counterpoint to the Cruise character. He's just your average joe hoping to get ahead in life but obviously taking a long time to get there, just like most people.


What's refreshing about this film is that it doesn't scatter the character development over too many players. The lack of comedic lines also reinforces the grittiness of the script. Michael Mann has produced a mostly believable thriller, that makes the competition look like cartoons for adults.

Sure, there are stretches in the storyline but so long as you're prepared to gloss over them, this is a fine film. Collateral is also much better than Cruise's last film, the pretensioulsy bloated The Last Samurai. Anyone looking for a non-stop action film or a "Lethal Weapon"-type film should look elsewhere.

Review by Triniman.

#6 — August 7, 2004 @ 03:51AM — Vic [URL]

Hey Triniman, your comment isn't supposed to be better than my review. ;-)

Nicely done.

Vic

#7 — August 7, 2004 @ 21:21PM — Triniman

Sorry, Vic! I wasn't sure if I should have posted that review or not. I try to review one new film a week, just for fun.

I enjoyed your review, by the way.

Cheers.

#8 — August 7, 2004 @ 22:40PM — Vic [URL]

Hey man, I was just kidding. :-) Great review... you should repost it as a blog entry.

Best regards,

Vic

#9 — September 22, 2004 @ 19:12PM — Mark [URL]

* What was the deal with the fox in the road ?

* Was it really a big coincidence in the end or in the beginning? ie. Wasnt Vincent coming out of the same building in the beginning of the movie (with keypass and all) as the one on his final stop??

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/18360)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments