Michel Hellman gets interviewed
Published August 06, 2004
Chris: Yes, because of the way that they subsidized ATSA, and what the result was.
Michel: It's not bad but... I think Roadsworth is better.
Chris: In theory I like the idea, knowing what ATSA did with "Murs du feu" and then seeing how FRAG ended up, basically a bunch of posters, it misses something. There are certain posters that are better; the one on Pine Ave. where they have three pictures that were taken in the same exact place 50 years apart.
Michel: They should have done just that. That would have been interesting.
Chris: But you have to consider the historical aspect, If the pictures don't exist, how are you going to do that?
Michel: But there was that big show about Blvd. Saint Laurent at Pointe-a-Calliere.
Chris: FRAG is designed for tourists and if ATSA were to come up with pamphlets for walking tours, you could look at the posters and because they are in front of businesses, the tourists would then go into the businesses, they then buy something there, everybody goes home happy.
Michel: It's easy to criticize everything too, these are people who are doing something for the city.
Chris: Moving on. Since you've been an art critic, what's the best show you've seen?
Michel: That's a hard question, I really liked the one that was on at the Leonard and Bina Ellen Gallery this past spring. It was an exhibition on Jack Beder, I had never heard about him before. Montreal in the 30's and that was really interesting cause it was historical and it made me discover something. I guess I like historical stuff. With regards to newer art... let me think it over.
Chris: What was the best show you haven't reviewed?
Michel: The best show that I didn't review, was in 2002 at UQAM, daprèsledépeupleur/afterthelostones. Artists responding to Samuel Beckett. Guy Pellerin, Jana Sterbak, Smith/Stewart and David Tomas. They responded in different ways, it was very elegant and all the works were very interesting. I was talking to Bernard Lamarche about it and he remembered it as well, so yeah, I'm addicted to themes. It was an interesting theme, which was smart at the same time. I don't like themes that are too simplistic, like sculptures by women, it could be interesting historically but more likely, you just go see the show and nothing comes out of it. daprèsledépeupleur/afterthelostones made you think a little bit and read a little bit, it was very well done. I like the UQAM gallery, they often have good stuff. I think the big disappointment is all the shows I saw at the Musee d'Art Contemporain since I've been a critic. I think that they have all been pretty bad. Even their permanent collection, they were showing their collection of Montreal artists and the Musee des Beaux Arts, has a lot better collection and most of the shows I've seen at the Musee des Beaux Arts were very good, I think Stephan Aquin does a really good job as curator of contemporary art. Have you seen their permanent exhibit? The new collection of contemporary art they have? It's a really good collection of stuff. The worst show, by far was XXXXX XXXXXXX.
- Michel Hellman gets interviewed
- Published: August 06, 2004
- Type:
- Section: Culture
- Writer: Zeke's Gallery, Montreal
- Zeke's Gallery, Montreal's BC Writer page
- Zeke's Gallery, Montreal's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us











