<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on The Duke On "The Village" - Politics, Deception and The Cinema Of Lies</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 7 Aug 2004 19:15:31 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/05/124524.php#comment-78637</link>
<description>&quot;time check&quot;, is this some sort of Belfast Cowboy version of &quot;Marco Polo&quot;?

Just wondering, or did M. Shite Manfulobogusbastard put some sort wierd hex on your fevered imagination? 

Blink once for yes, twice for no.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78637@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 7 Aug 2004 19:15:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Aaron, Duke De Mondo</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/05/124524.php#comment-78618</link>
<description>time check</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78618@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 7 Aug 2004 15:09:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Aaron, Duke De Mondo</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/05/124524.php#comment-78334</link>
<description>eric, if i ever die (which, granted, is pretty far-fetched), i will ask that your comment be etched on mine tomb stone.
Actually, i&#039;d better ask before i die.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78334@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Aug 2004 21:01:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/05/124524.php#comment-78332</link>
<description>woe to the filmmaker who conjures the wrath of the Duke from within the gentle pool of favorable predisposition</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78332@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Aug 2004 20:36:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/05/124524.php#comment-78322</link>
<description>It has come to my attention that Bruce Willis, while having worked on &quot;projects&quot; classified as &quot;crap&quot;, &quot;bullshit&quot;, &quot;monkey-poo-flingingly awful&quot; and &quot;paycheques&quot; in IMDB, he was granted clemency for his key role in bringing Pauly Shore and Andrew &quot;Dice&quot; Clay to justice in a carefully coordinated takedown in their West Hollywood &quot;love-pad&quot;.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78322@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Aug 2004 19:03:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Aaron, Duke De Mondo</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/05/124524.php#comment-78320</link>
<description>Phil, that kinda compliment slinging means a lot to me, is what, although i think you&#039;re selling yourself short. I enjoy your writing immensley.
Jim, harsh words, man. I actually really liked m night&#039;s last three flicks. Unbreakable, i think, is a brilliant work. Everyone yacks on about the twist, tho, and i gotta admit it didnt feel like much of a revelation, really. just a natural develoment type deal. Unlike this nonsense right here. Insulted is the word, man. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78320@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Aug 2004 18:52:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/05/124524.php#comment-78318</link>
<description>While Charles M. Shultz made a decades long career out of Lucy yanking the football away from Charlie Brown, I can only think M. Mightbe Shalmalangadingdong is only delusional.

I hated with passion only the really cheated can feel, whatever that dumbass Bruce Willis movie was, no, not that one, the other one.

There&#039;s no way this charlatan will ever get his hands on any of my money for his Hollywood three-card monte.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78318@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Aug 2004 18:28:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Phillip Winn</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/05/124524.php#comment-78282</link>
<description>If only &lt;i&gt;Praying With Anger&lt;/i&gt; was available on DVD to mock mercilessly!

Thanks, Duke. Your stuff always makes me laugh -- and turn green with envy. I couldn&#039;t really hope to duplicate your style, on account of I&#039;m not into swearing and such, and plus it&#039;s your style, not mine. But that doesn&#039;t stop me from wishing. Wishing I was a better writer, is what. 

Anyway, keep up the fine work.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">78282@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:29:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>