I-Robot vs. I-Pod vs. I-Monkey

Written by Half Baked
Published August 04, 2004

Human survival depends on paranoia. We just know there's some malicious creature out there ready to fight us for the helm of Spaceship Earth. But Alien vs. Predator has been done already, so I'm fretting over the latest terrestrial threats instead: I-Robot, I-Pod, and I-Monkey.

As a species, we're just smart enough to realize we're stupid...stupid enough to create robots and computers that want to kill us, ala The Matrix and I-Robot. Suprisingly, even Apple's cutesy I-Pod just recently achieved consciousness (I-pod Therefore I am), and apples have been a problem for humankind since the Genesis days, so we must take the little devil-gizmo seriously. Finally, we have the recent news about a monkey walking Planet-of-the-Apes upright: I-Monkey. Its one thing for Disney to anthropomorphize animals, it's quite another for animals to anthropomorphize themselves. If a monkey walking around bolt-upright doesn't make you sit bolt-upright in the middle of the night screaming "Get your filthy paws off me you damn dirty ape," nothing will.

But of these latest competitors to the human race, which is the most likely to replace us?

Let's consider the I-Pod first. I say it's got no chance against humans simply because it's already too philosophical...'I-Pod Therefore I Am.' When's the last time you met a philosopher that could fight? Plato could barely whip the shadow puppets on his cave wall. If the two-day old I-Pod is already spouting this kind of crap, imagine what it's going to be like after a few years of Moore's Law evolution? It'll convince itself that life doesn't matter anyway-- we're all just energy patterns on some existential plane of purity. All we have to do is put hemlock within arms reach, sit back, and wait. Either that or let the RIAA continue its fratricide on all music recording devices--either way, I-Pod is out of the picture.

So that leaves I-Robot and I-Monkey. Ruthless as they are, both of these enemies have a code they live by. For robots it's the infamous three laws:


  1. A robot may not injure a human being, or, through
    inaction allow a human being to come to harm.

  2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings
    except where such orders would conflict with the first law.

  3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such
    protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

Apes have only one law:


  1. Ape shall not kill ape.

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
I-Robot vs. I-Pod vs. I-Monkey
Published: August 04, 2004
Type:
Section: Sci/Tech
Filed Under: Culture: Humor and Satire, Sci/Tech: Internet
Writer: Half Baked
Half Baked's BC Writer page
Half Baked's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Half Baked
Culture: Humor and Satire
Sci/Tech: Internet
All Sci/Tech Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — August 4, 2004 @ 09:14AM — Eric Olsen

twisted and thought-provoking!

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/18256)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments