<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on The Village</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 3 Aug 2004 12:00:10 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Nathaniel Winn</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/02/141121.php#comment-77833</link>
<description>Hmm . . . I keep thinking that if people would stop treating M. Night&#039;s movies like gumball machines that produce surprises instead of gumballs, they would find that &lt;i&gt;The Village &lt;/i&gt; is, in fact, quite a moving and thought-provoking bit of film.
The group I saw the flick with &lt;b&gt;loved&lt;/b&gt; it, and spent hours talking about it, and saw it again the next day.
And sure enough, leaving the theater the second time, we were surrounded by comments like, &quot;Suckiest movie ever!&quot; and the like.
Oh well.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">77833@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Aug 2004 12:00:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Justene</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/02/141121.php#comment-77778</link>
<description>Tom, I am pretty sure that&#039;s why they invented single malt scotch.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">77778@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Aug 2004 18:05:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom Johnson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/02/141121.php#comment-77770</link>
<description>That&#039;s how bothered I am by it, Justene.  I just can&#039;t let this crap go.  I need help, therapy, pills . . .  &lt;i&gt;something.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">77770@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Aug 2004 17:57:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Justene</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/02/141121.php#comment-77763</link>
<description>How bad a movie could it have been to keep you thinking like that for 2 days?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">77763@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Aug 2004 17:06:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom Johnson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/02/141121.php#comment-77762</link>
<description>I&#039;ve spent the past couple of days thinking about why this movie was so disappointing.  I think he dropped the ball, big time.  In thinking about why and how he could have avoided that, I came up with a much more intriguing set of scenarios than what actually happened in the movie.  If you&#039;d like to read it, do so &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thebeautifullull.com/wp-content/thevillage.txt&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, but don&#039;t do so if you don&#039;t want the story to be spoiled.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">77762@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Aug 2004 16:59:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Kent</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/02/141121.php#comment-77746</link>
<description>Tom,

Didn&#039;t mean to call you a &quot;soccer mom,&quot; just meant that &lt;i&gt;The Village&lt;/i&gt; will have a similar division of opinion I believe......there WILL be a lot of folks who hate it.....I&#039;m not one of them.

I too loved &lt;i&gt;Blair Witch Project&lt;/I&gt; - a better film than &lt;i&gt;The Village&lt;/i&gt; by far, but a film that created heated debate and angered many viewers........ </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">77746@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Aug 2004 15:27:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom Johnson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/02/141121.php#comment-77742</link>
<description>Chris, I loved &lt;i&gt;The Blair Witch Project&lt;/i&gt; - I thought it was intriguing and scary as hell.  So please don&#039;t lump me in with those who can&#039;t appreciate some different and non-gory spooks.  This was just an effort that falls flat in nearly every aspect.

Tom, it&#039;s really difficult to address anything without giving too much away.  The first giveaway to one of the two twists was in the first five minutes of the movie, involving a long focus on what might be considered just part of the setup.  The clues to the other twist were more piece together than outright - once I had an idea about the one twist, the other fell into place behind it pretty quickly.  I sincerely hoped that second twist wasn&#039;t going to be what I thought it was, but it turned out to be exactly what I predicted.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">77742@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Aug 2004 15:18:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/02/141121.php#comment-77734</link>
<description>Tom?

What are the clues you saw that gave it away?


I saw the plot twists about 5 minutes before they were displayed.  I thought the pacing was very good in showing the secrets; cut scenes and the like.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">77734@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:59:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Kent</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/08/02/141121.php#comment-77730</link>
<description>Tom, a lot of people will have your reaction. Sort of like &lt;i&gt;The Blair Witch Project&lt;/I&gt;......I walked out of the theater loving it, and a soccer mom standing next to me said, &quot;That&#039;s the worst piece of shit I ever did see....&quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">77730@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:52:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>