Anti-wars find no solace at the DNC

Written by Mark Edward Manning
Published July 30, 2004

This particular piece of anti-war left-wing satire is actually pretty funny and clever. At least it demonstrates one healthy aspect about this year's DNC convention - the "peace" protestors are being held at bay.

Not only were they were caged off, and rightly so, given their great potential for causing mayhem, but a peace protestor with the women's protest group Code Pink, Medea Benjamin, was shown the doors to the FleetCenter after unfurling a banner exclaiming "End the Occupation of Iraq!" during Theresa Heinz' speech.

Interestingly enough, Benjamin snubbed Nader, choosing to support Kerry instead, arguing that change could come within the ranks of the Democratic Party if only the anti-war voices of protest were loud enough.

The Democrats, however, know that loud enough is too loud, and they have learned their lesson. Kerry is the modern day Hubert Humphrey; it is 1968 all over again; and Boston needs to be safeguarded against the pot boiling over like it did in Chicago 36 years ago.

The Democrats know the nature of the anti-war beast and they have seen fit to rein it in. Preventative actions on the streets of Boston and the none-too-sympathetic reaction to Ms. Benjamin's banner seem to prove the case.

Mark Edward Manning grew up in Boston, MA and now lives in London, England. He wrote commentaries for The Boston Herald in the mid 1990s.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Anti-wars find no solace at the DNC
Published: July 30, 2004
Type:
Section: Politics
Writer: Mark Edward Manning
Mark Edward Manning's BC Writer page
Mark Edward Manning's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Mark Edward Manning
All Politics Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — July 30, 2004 @ 10:00AM — David Flanagan [URL]

My only question is this; is it a sincere effort to reign in the radical left of their party, or are they just trying to mute that voice long enough to get swing voters to consider Kerry? Personally, I don't have a problem with anti-war/peace protesters on the whole, but a lot of the Iraq and Afghanistan-centered protests have been pushed by some pretty radical organizations like International ANSWER.

If the effort to reign that in is sincere, then more power to Democrats. If it's just about muting their voice long enough to get a crack at the Presidency, then it's just another level of deception.

Thanks.

David

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/18051)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments