<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Rock grammar, issue #1: Paul McCartney "Live And Let Die"</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 7 Apr 2006 14:34:54 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by zingzing</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/28/113807.php#comment-347888</link>
<description>this world in which we&#039;re living?

is that possibly what he said?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">347888@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Apr 2006 14:34:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Christopher Rose</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/28/113807.php#comment-347779</link>
<description>Bart: Well if your soul&#039;s real, where is it?

Milhouse: It&#039;s kinda in here... and when you sneeze, that&#039;s your soul trying to escape. Saying god bless you crams it back in. And when you die, it squirms out and flies away!

Bart: What if you die in a submarine at the bottom of the ocean?

Milhouse: Oh, it can swim, it&#039;s even got wheels, in case you die in the desert and have to drive to the cemetery. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">347779@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Apr 2006 11:53:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Vern Halen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/28/113807.php#comment-347760</link>
<description>Sometimes it&#039;s hard to find the humor on this blog on which we blog on sometimes.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">347760@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Apr 2006 11:29:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/28/113807.php#comment-347748</link>
<description>No, no changing of this piece, no deletion.  I&#039;m just stunned at the inability of people to comprehend what they&#039;re reading.  It&#039;s always fun to get an alert of a comment on this because it&#039;s always surprising to see the dunderheadedness of people on the internet.  &quot;Humor,&quot; people, do you recognize that?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">347748@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Apr 2006 11:10:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jet in Columbus</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/28/113807.php#comment-347664</link>
<description>My father was in the airforce and I grew up literally at the end of the runway pattern of Greater Pittsburgh International Airport.
As a kid, I&#039;d run around the yard as the jets flew over VERY LOW with their landing gears down, and make jet noises, and I acquired the nickname.

I used to never refer to them as jets, they were L1011&#039;s or 747s or C124s.

One winter when it snowed, I shoveled out a giant HI DAD in our acre back hard, because my father flew right over our house to land.

From then on I was known as Jet</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">347664@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Apr 2006 08:41:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Christopher Rose</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/28/113807.php#comment-347620</link>
<description>Time passes differently on the web, Jet. 

Tell me, are you named for the McCartney song?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">347620@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Apr 2006 05:06:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jet in Columbus</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/28/113807.php#comment-347585</link>
<description>Help me understand this, is everyone aware that this whole thing was written almost 2 YEARS ago????</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">347585@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Apr 2006 01:29:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jet in Columbus</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/28/113807.php#comment-347584</link>
<description>Tom, trust me, I just got hit for using It&#039;s instead of its, in a string I just had published an hour ago, so I know the feeling, but if I were you, I&#039;d have done my homework on line.  I also got the amount of money a guy lost in the stock market per share confused with the actual price he sold it for.  It was easily fixed with a quick &quot;I&#039;m wrong&quot; and a thanks to Dave Nalle, but this is beyond that.

So as gently as I can...

the word &quot;If&quot; blows this whole string sky high, and I&#039;d delete it.

I bought the vinal soundtrack album for the movie the day it came out waaaaaaaaaaaaay back when, and trust me Axl did not do it justice at all.  But you know what I&#039;ve learned over the years?  You like the first version you hear, so if you heard Axl first, you&#039;d think Paul&#039;s version sucked.

All things being equal, I&#039;d delete the whole post before a bunch more give ya grief, my friend...

...but that&#039;s only my opinion.
Jet</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">347584@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Apr 2006 01:27:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/28/113807.php#comment-347575</link>
<description>Ale, first, I&#039;m hoping your English classes included a section on &quot;sarcasm.&quot;

Second, the issue is not with the phrase &quot;but if this ever&quot; or &quot;but in this ever.&quot;  It is with the phrase &quot;in which we live in.&quot;  It&#039;s either &quot;in which we live&quot; or &quot;which we live in&quot; - there is no need for two instances of &quot;in&quot; there.

But, most of all, people, get a grip!  For those of you who got it and played along, thank you!  The rest of you . . . yikes.  This was just a fun piece, which is something that should be very obvious just in the way I composed it - it is obviously tongue-in-cheek.  Oh well, I guess there&#039;s no hope for humor in America.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">347575@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Apr 2006 01:04:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ale</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/28/113807.php#comment-347422</link>
<description>I can&#039;t believe it, I JUST CANNOT!! I&#039;m a mexican student of English. I&#039;ve been studying this language for a year now; correct my grammar if you wish, tell me I&#039;m wrong....BUT.... YOU NATIVE SPEAKERS GET YOURSELVES INFORMED FIRST!!! IT GOES &quot;BUT IF THIS EVER...&quot;  IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, NO IN...IN.

PAUL, GOD, FORGIVE THEM, THEY DON&#039;T KNOW WHAT THEY&#039;RE SAYING...

you smarty pants</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">347422@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 Apr 2006 19:36:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by DJRadiohead</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/28/113807.php#comment-249152</link>
<description>Anyone who has read my posts probably wishes I had my copy more handy- although I think my typing is worse than my grammar.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">249152@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 Oct 2005 11:02:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by vern halen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/28/113807.php#comment-249134</link>
<description>&#039;S OK..... Strunk &amp; White.... I still have a copy buried away somewhere next to my Baltimore Catechism.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">249134@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 Oct 2005 10:51:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by DJRadiohead</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/28/113807.php#comment-249127</link>
<description>Strunk &amp; White... reminds me of all my journalism classes.  Thanks, Vern!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">249127@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 Oct 2005 10:46:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by DJRadiohead</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/28/113807.php#comment-249126</link>
<description>The number of grammatical gaffes in popular music puts George W Bush to shame.  Too many to list.

I love this post.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">249126@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 Oct 2005 10:46:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by vern halen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/28/113807.php#comment-249121</link>
<description>Make all the grammar teachers go home and read their Strunk &amp; White, please. The rest of us will go with artistic licence.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">249121@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 Oct 2005 10:43:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Roy E</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/28/113807.php#comment-249118</link>
<description>There is NO issue here!

Positively, the lyric is:

&quot;If this ever-changin&#039; world in which we&#039;re livin&#039; makes you give in and cry...&quot;

I fussed over this for years and settled it awhile back by listening ultra-carefully to several live performances.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">249118@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 Oct 2005 10:39:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Storey</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/28/113807.php#comment-233584</link>
<description>It does not really matter if the lyrics reads &quot;in which we&#039;re livin&#039;&quot; or &quot;in which we live in&quot; beacause that is not the end of the sentence.  The whole sentence reads &quot;If this ever-changing world in which we&#039;re livin&#039; makes you give in and cry.&quot;  Just something to think about.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">233584@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:11:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark the Sane and Sensible</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/28/113807.php#comment-213953</link>
<description>Really, what can you expect from a pothead and high school graduate like mccartney? There was one truly intelligent person that went into rock music, and that was Frank Zappa. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">213953@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:31:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sephiroth1wa</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/28/113807.php#comment-213948</link>
<description>It&#039;s a song... do songs need to be grammatically correct? go through every song throughout history and correct them then you can say bad stuff about all of them ok? music is music it needs to go to a beat and if he says it who cares.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">213948@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:24:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Clarke</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/28/113807.php#comment-130516</link>
<description>Starting the line with &quot;in&quot; would make no sense for McCartney to do, anyway - consider the following line!  I believe the proper lyrics are:

&quot;If this ever-changing world in which we&#039;re livin&#039;
Makes you give in and cry&quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">130516@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:59:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Rodney Welch</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/28/113807.php#comment-76925</link>
<description>Clubhouse -- Actually my vote for dumbest Dylan song is &quot;Lenny Bruce,&quot; the famous comedian who &quot;never robbed any churches nor cut off any babies&#039; heads.&quot;
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">76925@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:05:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Vern Halen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/28/113807.php#comment-76887</link>
<description>It bugs me too, but I believe this is  a case of McCartney indulging in artistic licence. It&#039;s fine, just as loong as he doesn&#039;t decide to pick up a second job in which to make a living in. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">76887@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:23:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/28/113807.php#comment-76816</link>
<description>ooh, there&#039;s a wrinkle</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">76816@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:49:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dave</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/28/113807.php#comment-76814</link>
<description>&quot;But in this ever changing world in which we live in.&quot;

FYI, It&#039;s actually &quot;&lt;b&gt;IF&lt;/b&gt; this ever-changing...&quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">76814@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:37:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by ClubhouseCancer</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/28/113807.php#comment-76613</link>
<description>He doesn&#039;t discuss that one, which is just a silly kids&#039; sin-along song after all. Do you find that one particularly stupid? There&#039;s worse, but there is no point in dwelling on the small amount of subpar Dylan when there&#039;s sooooooo much good stuff, the best of which is the among the very best of modern music, IMHO.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">76613@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:26:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>