<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Why Does Rall Get a Pass?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2004 12:15:51 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Phillip Winn</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/21/113735.php#comment-75472</link>
<description>Shhh, BCB, don&#039;t confuse Dan with any possibility other than &quot;liberals = evil&quot;, m&#039;kay? 

:-)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">75472@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2004 12:15:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Distorted Angel</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/21/113735.php#comment-75471</link>
<description>The only place I&#039;ve ever seen Rall&#039;s stuff is right here on Blogcritics. Most of my friends are unfamiliar with his work as well. Is he widely syndicated?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">75471@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2004 12:15:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by boomcrashbaby</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/21/113735.php#comment-75469</link>
<description>Perhaps most liberals are like me and don&#039;t read Rall.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">75469@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2004 12:08:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Phillip Winn</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/21/113735.php#comment-75459</link>
<description>Dan (#9), &quot;By their acceptance&quot;? Whose acceptance? What constitutes &quot;acceptance&quot;? Should all of his strips be yanked in the name of political correctness? Should he lose his job? 

In a world in which the vast majority of Americans are mourning 9/11 (rewind with me a bit), and Ted Rall publishes a vile cartoon that inflames the world, how exactly should a liberal satisfy you that he doesn&#039;t agree with or accept Rall? Must he burn an effigy of him in the town square, or is it okay to continue on with the mourning and simply ignore him?

I think Rall is beyond the pale, but I hardly think that liberals have been accepting of him _because_ of his statements. Instead I think that they, as I do, believe that it is important that the right to express even fringe political views is defended.

And yeah, if the people who raise a hue and cry when public figures make racist statements were consistent, I would expect an uproar over this. And I don&#039;t expect one, because those public figures are not consistent, and never have been. They also don&#039;t necessarily represent the views of mainstream liberals.

Does Michael Savage represent your views? What have you done to make that clear -- he&#039;s made some disgusting statements in public. Does the first comment on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prometheus6.org/2004/07/al_barger_of_culpepper_log.php&quot;&gt;this page&lt;/a&gt; represent your views? What have you done to repudiate it?

If you&#039;re talking about the &quot;liberal&quot; bogeymen invented by the RNC to raise funds, then sure, they just love Ted Rall. But if you&#039;re talking about the majority of people who voted for Gore in the last election, I don&#039;t think so, not at all.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">75459@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2004 10:33:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/21/113735.php#comment-75434</link>
<description>the silence is deafening</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">75434@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2004 07:07:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by RJ</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/21/113735.php#comment-75337</link>
<description>Bellafonte calling Powell a &quot;house slave&quot; got big-time attention, but Bellafonte is black, so he got a pass.

Ted Rall is a white guy, so his use of such verbage should spark an outcry from black leaders. Because it doesn&#039;t, there is clearly a double-standard based on political affiliation.

QED.   :)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">75337@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 21:27:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dan</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/21/113735.php#comment-75323</link>
<description>&quot;By what measure?&quot;

By their acceptance of it of course.  Seems like there was a time when lib&#039;s didn&#039;t countenence the vile slander of blacks as Rall exhibits.  Liberals show their hypocricy when conservative blacks like Rice and Powell are thrown under the bus.  You think the term &quot;house nigga&quot; is appropriate?
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">75323@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 19:34:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Phillip Winn</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/21/113735.php#comment-75306</link>
<description>Rall is &quot;finding a home in contemporary main-stream liberal politics?&quot; By what measure?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">75306@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 18:28:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dan</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/21/113735.php#comment-75303</link>
<description>Didn&#039;t say he was archetypical, just that he was welcome.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">75303@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 18:11:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/21/113735.php#comment-75286</link>
<description>Oh, I don&#039;t think he is a liberal archetype so much as a just-plain-dick archetype.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">75286@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:45:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dan</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/21/113735.php#comment-75281</link>
<description>Not only is he un-funny, he can&#039;t draw!   His characters resemble the type of crude depictions one might see on public bathroom stalls, only with clothes on.  He seems to be a very ugly bitter-minded person.  A type that is, unfortunately, finding a home in contemporary main-stream liberal politics.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">75281@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:40:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by NC</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/21/113735.php#comment-75274</link>
<description>Good question.  Where&#039;s the Mac Diva post on this one?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">75274@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:08:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tim Hall</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/21/113735.php#comment-75266</link>
<description>Rall commits the ultimate cardinal sin; he&#039;s not actually funny. 

Give me The Guardian&#039;s Steve Bell any day!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">75266@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 16:24:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by SFC SKI</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/21/113735.php#comment-75226</link>
<description>He&#039;s not rude, he&#039;s edgy!
He must be right, he&#039;s making people mad!

He is not syndicated in my paper, so he can pound sand as far as I&#039;m concerned.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">75226@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:02:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Laurence Simon</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/21/113735.php#comment-75218</link>
<description>I think that Rall hates himself more than I hate him.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">75218@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:31:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>