<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Apologies</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 09:58:36 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/18/011645.php#comment-75182</link>
<description>excesive self-analysis can lead to paralysis (I like that, it rhymes)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">75182@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 09:58:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dirtgrain</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/18/011645.php#comment-75085</link>
<description>Clarice Starling to Hannibal Lecter: &quot;You see a lot don&#039;t you doctor [insert Blogcritics]. Why don&#039;t you turn that high-powered perception at yourself and tell us what you see, or, maybe you&#039;re afraid to.&quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">75085@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 23:22:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Aaron, Duke De Mondo</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/18/011645.php#comment-75048</link>
<description>heh, i don&#039;t think there&#039;s enough room in the peoples republic of china for to fit all those nautical conversationists.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">75048@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 21:30:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Shark</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/18/011645.php#comment-75024</link>
<description>Maybe the Pirates of the Caribbean II folks should move in.

I&#039;ll give somebody my seat.


PS: Montreal? What the hell is it again?

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">75024@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 16:44:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Kent</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/18/011645.php#comment-75011</link>
<description>Yes, but was she from Montreal?.......:)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">75011@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:46:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/18/011645.php#comment-75006</link>
<description>I once met a nice Canadian girl sleeping under a car at the US Festival</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">75006@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:42:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/18/011645.php#comment-75005</link>
<description>Oh, and I didn&#039;t mean to imply that MD was harsh, she was quite diplomatic.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">75005@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:40:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Kent</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/18/011645.php#comment-75004</link>
<description>Hey!! That&#039;s not fair!!!

I thought this was the &quot;Get out our Canadian Frustrations&quot; thread.....</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">75004@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:38:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Rodney Welch</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/18/011645.php#comment-75001</link>
<description>Kinda reminds me of the time I met a ginsoaked barroom queen in Memphis. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">75001@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:31:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Kent</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/18/011645.php#comment-74999</link>
<description>I was covering a convention once in Toronto and met this beautiful woman from Montreal at the Chelsea Hotel. We spent the entire week together, visiting Chinatown, Madison Avenue Pub, a Comedy Club, and other places. When she would call her parents she would speak in French. *sighs* She was the love of my life, though I never saw her again after that week. One day I shall visit Montreal for the first time. I hear it&#039;s a nice city. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">74999@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:25:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/18/011645.php#comment-74997</link>
<description>What a thread: the obscure meets the abrasive meets the oblique. While the criticism was way too harsh, I think MD has it about right that in theory each post should stand alone: even a sentence or two set up (with link to further background info) is usually enough to give some context.

Beyond that, the only sure thing I know is that people don&#039;t give a shit about that which they don&#039;t give a shit.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">74997@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:16:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Aaron, Duke De Mondo</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/18/011645.php#comment-74990</link>
<description>re - jim&#039;s comment #9 - ah, i see now. Having just been attacked by a dose of the AIF, i see that the &quot;that is all&quot; sign-off is something of a regularity amongst a few. 
Well, i can assure you that i was, in fact, thinking of that simpsons episode when the german folks are announcing the pay-offs. &quot;Simpson. Homer. That is all.&quot;
So sorry for the confusion.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">74990@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 13:55:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Shark</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/18/011645.php#comment-74790</link>
<description>Gore comes clean regarding his writing goals:

&lt;B&gt;&quot;I don&#039;t really care if anyone knows what I&#039;m talking about.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

~Mission Accomplished!

PS: Even a Canadian Idol needs a &#039;Simon&#039;. 


</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">74790@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2004 09:17:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/18/011645.php#comment-74747</link>
<description>Typo in Comment 11: Should read &quot;up to James to decide.&quot;

However, I believe a blog entry should make its points without people going to the links.  Most readers do not check out the links.  I believe links should offer additional information and context, not core material.  It should be in the entry.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">74747@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2004 21:51:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by James Gore</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/18/011645.php#comment-74737</link>
<description>I think the funniest thing about all this is that I offered a link to my blog explaining what I&#039;m talking about in the post. Therefore, if people actually cared to know what I&#039;m talking about and not care about that but just want to complain instead, they would click on the link.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">74737@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2004 20:14:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tom</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/18/011645.php#comment-74729</link>
<description>I think he was practicing for the National Doublespeak contest.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">74729@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2004 19:44:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mac Diva</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/18/011645.php#comment-74727</link>
<description>I didn&#039;t &#039;get&#039; the entry either.  Read it three times to make sure.  Perhaps an explanation of the parties and the issues would have helped.  Or, James might want to post things to &lt;i&gt;Blogcritics&lt;/i&gt; that are not so insider.   For example, Eric rarely posts entries from his local blog here.  I discussed Portland in an entry recently, but only because it was a party to a lawsuit with national implications.  Most of my regional stuff is not reposted here, either.  It is up James to, of course, but people do get exasperated when they don&#039;t know what you&#039;re talking about.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">74727@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2004 19:07:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Aaron, Duke De Mondo</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/18/011645.php#comment-74707</link>
<description>i dont think so man. i got both. why do u ask? (looks over post to see signs of fuckwittery. nope. none there, man)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">74707@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2004 14:58:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/18/011645.php#comment-74706</link>
<description>Duke, did you just accidentally out your own bad self as the fuckwit &quot;expert&quot; who didn&#039;t have an email address or web site?
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">74706@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2004 14:56:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Aaron, Duke De Mondo</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/18/011645.php#comment-74703</link>
<description>that was some nasty comment-flinging there. losts of stuff gets posted here that i don&#039;t neccesarily care for, that doesn&#039;t mean it isn&#039;t just as worthy as anything else. After all, this is blogcritics.org, not FolksWhatTalkAboutThingsILike.org

That is all</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">74703@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2004 14:36:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by James Gore</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/18/011645.php#comment-74698</link>
<description>I don&#039;t really care if anyone knows what I&#039;m talking about. If this doesn&#039;t affect your life whatsoever, why are you wasting your time reading this posting? I mean, if you really want to waste any more of you time, &lt;a href=&quot;http://budfrogs.ytmnd.com/&quot;&gt;check out this site&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">74698@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2004 14:18:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/18/011645.php#comment-74697</link>
<description>Hey, I&#039;m interested in Montreal city politics, not the least because I used to live there, and like a nice sherbet, provides a palette cleanser from the relentless stream of bullshit from elsewhere, where freedom is spelt: &quot;I THOGHT I TOLDED YOU TO SHUT THE FCUK UP!!!!!!&quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">74697@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2004 14:08:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Stately  Wayne Manor</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/18/011645.php#comment-74694</link>
<description>Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatinthefuckisthis
guytalikn&#039;bout? And who could give a rat
fuck about political bullshit in fucking
Montreal.

This post basically connects to almost
nobody,wastes cyberspace and also:
Just when did this place become a forum
for obscure Canuck political &amp; personal
apologies??? F**KING WEIRD.This place is
getting really bizarro world.Is this guy
a friend of yours or something Phillip?




</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">74694@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2004 13:38:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Patrick</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/18/011645.php#comment-74687</link>
<description>Duuude. That was the worst thing to come from Montreal since SARS.  Or was that Toronto.  What happened to SARS anyway?  Did some Hong Kong dude pack it up in his suitcase and go home?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">74687@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2004 12:06:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Shark</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/18/011645.php#comment-74686</link>
<description>Montreal politics? Oh, I see. Then go ahead and delete my entire comment.


PS: What&#039;s a &quot;Montreal&quot;?

 </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">74686@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2004 12:00:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>