"I can do that on one leg!" she shrieked

Written by Eric Olsen
Published July 16, 2004

Martha gets 5 months:

    Domestic icon Martha Stewart moved one step closer to a drastically different lifestyle behind bars when the millionaire entrepreneur was sentenced Friday to five months in prison for a stock-trading scandal.

    "I'll be back," she promised afterward, speaking in a strong voice on the courthouse steps. "I'm not afraid. Not afraid whatsoever. I'm very sorry it had to come to this."

    She also was ordered to serve five months of home confinement for lying to federal investigators. Stewart, who was also fined $30,000, was spared an immediate trip to federal prison when U.S. District Court Judge Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum stayed her sentence pending appeal.

    In the courtroom, her voice was shaky as she appealed for a reduced sentence, asking the judge to "remember all the good I have done." [AP]

The NY Times has more:

    Ms. Stewart was not convicted on any charges of insider trading, only for lying about the trade to investigators.

    "What was a close personal matter became an almost fatal circus of unprecedented proportions," she said, adding that 200 people at her company had lost their jobs as a result of the publicity surrounding her legal troubles.

    And in the plucky style for which the self-made millionaire is known, Ms. Stewart urged people to buy her magazine, and advertisers to keep purchasing ads. Meanwhile, she said, she will face whatever comes.

    ....The guidelines recommended a sentence of 10 to 16 months in prison for someone convicted of such crimes who has no previous record of criminal activity and is not considered a threat to society. Judges can add to or reduce a sentence for various reasons, including perceptions of the defendant's acceptance of responsibility.

    Ms. Stewart arrived at federal court this morning appearing grimfaced and accompanied by her daughter, Alexis, her son-in-law, John Cuti, who is also an attorney, a bodyguard and other lawyers. A horde of reporters, news cameras and onlookers had been awaiting her arrival, and some of those in the crowd cheered as Ms. Stewart, dressed in a dark pantsuit, stepped from a sport utility vehicle and walked up the courthouse steps without saying anything to the crowd.

Gene Healy of the Cato Institute thinks the lesson of the case is about "the ever-expanding power of federal prosecutors":

    James Comey, the federal prosecutor behind the Stewart case, says he went after Stewart "not because of who she is but because of what she did." But that's hard to believe given the audacious legal theory Comey used to pursue her.

    Comey didn't charge Stewart with insider trading. Instead, he claimed that Stewart's public protestations of innocence were designed to prop up the stock price of her own company, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, and thus constituted securities fraud. Stewart was also charged with making false statements to federal officials investigating the insider trading charge — a charge they never pursued. In essence, Stewart was prosecuted for "having misled people by denying having committed a crime with which she was not charged," as Cato Institute Senior Fellow Alan Reynolds put it.

    page 1 | 2 | 3
Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and publisher of Blogcritics.org, which, quite frankly, rules - as do his wife and four children.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
"I can do that on one leg!" she shrieked
Published: July 16, 2004
Type:
Section: Culture
Writer: Eric Olsen
Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
Eric Olsen's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Eric Olsen
All Culture Articles
Eric Olsen's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — July 16, 2004 @ 13:29PM — CW Fisher [URL]

If they can do this to Martha Stewart they can do this to any of us.

I'm actually glad this whole thing happened. She's the perfect model for what's happening here. The government, acting on behalf of a single prosecutor, decides he has a case against Martha Stewart, and makes a new case as each case is successively debunked until all that's left in the minds of the jury is a dizzying impression of crimes and treasons.

Guantanamo comes home.

It'll flip on appeal. Let's hope the defense is a little more flamboyant than the guy who's supposed to be investigating the leak at the White House that outted the CIA agent for not playing along.

Is it just me or are they everywhere?

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/17512)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments