<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Open Source Software Stifles Innovation</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:26:31 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Nelson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/10/214459.php#comment-73884</link>
<description>Sister, the internet was built on open source software, and that&#039;s the innovation that made innovations such as blogging possible.  See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.netaction.org/opensrc/future/create.html&quot;&gt;The Origins and Future of Open Source Software&lt;/a&gt;.   It&#039;s pure insanity to claim that open source software cannot be innovative.  In fact, if you study computing history, at one point in time ALL software was open source, and we somehow managed to innovate back then.  Given the better understanding of open source&#039;s strengths and weaknesses that we have today, there is no reason to suppose that we cannot be at least as innovative today as the pioneers of the digital age were.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">73884@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:26:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/10/214459.php#comment-73524</link>
<description>when microsoft comes out with something that is:

a) rock solid
b) innovative

then perhaps this argument will have some merit.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">73524@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:24:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Anita Campbell</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/10/214459.php#comment-73505</link>
<description>The gift economy is an &quot;interesting&quot; theory -- and just a theory.

Capitalism and cold hard cash still make the world go around.  The Soviets and the Chinese figured that out, although it took each of those societies a half century for their economic experiments to go down in flames. 

 </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">73505@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:02:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Casper</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/10/214459.php#comment-73492</link>
<description>To take some issue with the economic point of view, if you accept the concept that software is a Gift Economy (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gift-economy.com/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.socio.demon.co.uk/magazine/5/5barbrook.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gift_economy&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;), then it does make economic sense.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">73492@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2004 09:49:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>