<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on What Killed Postmodernism?</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2004 19:07:29 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Robert Nagle</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/10/094652.php#comment-90869</link>
<description>I just wanted to update my thoughts here. Apparently, the federal court decision about the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/suntrust/wdg53101petrhr.pdf&quot;&gt;Wind Done Him Wrong (PDF) &lt;/a&gt;court decision covers use of fictional characters for commercial works. So perhaps copyright owners do not have as much veto power as originally supposed. 

However, the threat is still there, and in cases where the borrowing is not a reworking of the original content(sampling), you&#039;re in uncertain waters. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">90869@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2004 19:07:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/10/094652.php#comment-73510</link>
<description>Excellent job on very important territory we have been trying to cover all along - personal and immediate is always more effective. Thanks and welcome, Robert!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">73510@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2004 12:38:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Shark</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/10/094652.php#comment-73375</link>
<description>&lt;A HREF=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/arts/3854021.stm&quot;&gt;full story&lt;/A&gt;

FYI: Pretty significant victory last week  re. artists and copyrighted/trademark materials. Check it out; it should warm the postmodern cockles of your heart.

&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt; excerpt ---

&quot;A US artist who won a five-year legal battle with toy company Mattel Inc. over his photographs of Barbie dolls has spoken of his joy at the ruling. 

Tom Forsythe said he was &quot;amazed and ecstatic&quot; at a court ruling last week that Mattel should reimburse the $1.8m (£1m) he spent defending his work. 

Mr Forsythe took photos of Barbie dolls in bizarre and often sexually provocative positions. 

A Mattel spokeswoman said they would continue to defend Barbie copyright. 

Forsythe said the ruling &quot;sets a new standard for the ability to criticise popular brands and do so without the fear of being sued&quot;.&quot;

++ end of excerpt ++

&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">73375@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2004 10:58:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>