<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Graphics Will NEVER Make the Game</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 9 Aug 2005 21:22:03 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by RC</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/10/023952.php#comment-201799</link>
<description>Man what about a classic game of Maniac Mansion on Original Nintendo. Like you said Matt, The graphics dont make the game. Alot of my favorite games lack in this area. It is all about how original and fun it is to play. In the point of the Nintendo Revoloution. I think Nintendo will do very well. They stated that there main ocncer is not Graphics, But How player frinedly the game is. The revoloution is name after the concept that, they beleive they will change gaming as we know it. And they can acheieve this by how interative and original there games our going to be for this system. Plus it helps that there console will be the first of its kind to be able to play every nintendo title ever made.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">201799@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Aug 2005 21:22:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Semi-Anonymous Banned Fella</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/10/023952.php#comment-73589</link>
<description>MATT:

Re: Star Control - I&#039;m not 100% sure, but that definitely sounds like it! Thanks for the tip. I may have to look for it on EBAY sometime...

As for &quot;Sarge Vs. Sarge&quot; I believe you are right that it was officially titled &quot;Sarge&quot; but in the arcade the title was simply displayed twice with a &quot;Vs.&quot; in the middle.

Thanks again!   :)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">73589@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:01:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jadester</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/10/023952.php#comment-73565</link>
<description>there was a series of two-player (or one player vs computer) ship-on ship games that were quite simple, many years ago.  i remember playing noe of them on the Amiga, although they were available on other micros and possibly a console or two.  can&#039;t for the life of me remember the name of them though.
Can you remember if the view you had was 3d? 1st person?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">73565@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2004 18:18:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Matt Paprocki</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/10/023952.php#comment-73544</link>
<description>The only game I can think of on the Genny that sounds right is Star Control, but it&#039;s a little deeper than just ship vs. ship. Check out this review and see if this rings a bell:
 http://www.digitpress.com/reviews/starcontrol.htm

If that doesn&#039;t sound right, keep thinking. The system had a boaload of space and shooters, so narrowing it down could be tough.

The console came out in 89, August I believe. Bit more than a decade.

Now, as for Sarge vs. Sarge, I&#039;m not real sure. Arcade games are not my expertise, but after booting up MAME, I found a game titled just &quot;Sarge&quot; by Midway. It came out in 85 and had you blowing stuff up with tanks. That&#039;s the only &quot;Sarge&quot; arcade game known too.

Now, I&#039;m guessing a game named S vs. S would probably be similar to the superb Genral Chaos, also on the Genesis (though I could be completely wrong). Do a quick google search for it as now I&#039;m strapped for time. See if it looks familiar. That may be what your thinking of.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">73544@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2004 16:30:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Semi-Anonymous Banned Fella</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/10/023952.php#comment-73458</link>
<description>Matt:

You&#039;re the video game expert here. I have been trying to find an oldy-but-goody for a while now. I have no idea what the name of it is, but please try to help me out from a brief description...

I THINK it was a Sega Genesis game. It was basically just two spaceships fighting each other. One spaceship per player. They each looked different, had different weapons and defenses, different sizes and shapes, etc.

It was kinda lame against the computer, but CLASSIC to play against another person.

It&#039;s probably been a decade or more since I played it. (Maybe this rules out Sega Genesis? When did that come out?) But it was an awesome game.

Also: What game systems (if any) have picked up the classic &quot;Sarge vs. Sarge&quot;? I loved that one in the arcade...

Thanks in advance...   :-0</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">73458@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:12:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Matt Paprocki</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/10/023952.php#comment-73385</link>
<description>No, you can&#039;t show wires anymore, but you can show really bad CGI and get away with it. Go figure.

I&#039;ve played very few games where the graphics ruined the experienced. Slowdown, frame rate issues, and stuff like that is usually the result of bad coding. Game like Disaster Report on the PS2 have just plain awful graphics, but it still was a blast to play (especially since it was highly original, but that is an entirely different story). 

Kevin: Get an Intell II. They work alot better and don&#039;t die as often as the original models. I&#039;ve been through at least 5 of the originals but my II has held on for years. Gotta have something to play Bump &amp; Jump and Shark! Shark! on.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">73385@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2004 12:44:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Harald</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/10/023952.php#comment-73378</link>
<description>Graphics may not be the be all and end all of gaming, they do play an important part. And gameplay isn&#039;t the overwhelming factor some people make it out to be. Crappy graphics can spoil your gaming experience. After all, would anyone let Hollywood get away with producing a film that shows the wires on the UFOs? Not unless there&#039;s a thick layer of irony on it. Graphics can&#039;t make a game, but they can break a game. That&#039;s why it&#039;s still considered a factor in games reviews. And that&#039;s why it&#039;s only one of many factors.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">73378@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2004 11:50:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Kevin McCallum</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/10/023952.php#comment-73377</link>
<description>You&#039;re bang on.  I&#039;ve been saying this for years.  I refuse to buy a Playstation 2 or an XBox, but I still have an Intellivision.  If only it worked.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">73377@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2004 11:04:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>