Mystic River

Written by Finkleman
Published July 08, 2004

Movie Review: Mystic River

Originally appeared on Pistonhips

I can't think of another movie I've seen that kept me so intrigued and had me convinced it was a very good film only to have it wind up with the most completely worthless and incongruous ending possible.

Not an ending that I didn't agree with but one that simply didn't fit with anything else that had gone before. You can literally feel the suspension of disbelief fall out from under you in those last 10-12 minutes of the film.

I should be clear in pointing out that this is a very small part of the whole film, after the climax, after such cliched scenes as the cops arriving at the last minute to avert a point-blank shooting. The film had been so good at that point that it didn't matter if scenes like that were cliched. Do these last few minutes render the previous two hours of superb drama void? No, but they do seriously detract from what otherwise is a very good film.

It's as if director Clint Eastwood decided he had to do something so contrary so as to distinguish himself as a serious film-maker

It's as if he, during the time they were filming those scenes that make up the pathetic resolution, was on a David Lynch film-watching binge and decided he would pay tribute to the modern day cinematic surrealist.

It's as if he decided to direct the actors to play their roles in those scenes as if they had all dropped LSD.

A brief synopsis: 3 childhood friends playing in the street, one is abducted and sexually molested over a 4-day period, leaving him emotionally broken. Flash forward 30 years or so and the 3 have all led drastically different lives, no longer friends although they still see each other occasionally in the Boston neighbourhood they grew up in. The character Jimmy Markum (played by Sean Penn), a hard-case who has done time and still has one foot in the crooked lifestyle, has a 19 year-old daughter who is murdered. This is the event that brings the former friends back together.

Dave Boyle (the one who as a child had been molested--played by Tim Robbins), now a broken man, seems to be a suspect for the murder (and Eastwood does everything to make the viewer think this is plausible) while the detective investigating the crime, Sean Devine (played by Kevin Bacon) is the other friend.

Back to the fucked up ending.

What happens in those last few minutes that skews things so badly?

**spoiler**

After having murdered his childhood friend based on the false belief that he had killed his daughter, Markum is sitting on a kerb in the cold light of dawn as detective Devine drives up and informs him that the real killers have been found. The dismissive, blase reaction of both characters (Markum makes it clear he has killed Boyle) is totally ridiculous in light of what has transpired. After the soul searching and gut-wrenching events that have wracked the main characters throughout, this "shit happens," response is bizarre not least for the fact that Devine is a cop who has, together with his partner Whitey Powers, made it clear during the film that they possess the usual loathing that cinematic cops feel for criminals.

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Mystic River
Published: July 08, 2004
Type:
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Crime, Video: Drama, Video: Suspense and Mystery
Writer: Finkleman
Finkleman's BC Writer page
Finkleman's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Finkleman
Video: Crime
Video: Drama
Video: Suspense and Mystery
All Video Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — July 9, 2004 @ 10:23AM — Eric Olsen

Very passionate and articulate review, Lenny. Thanks and welcome!

#2 — July 9, 2004 @ 11:24AM — dirtgrain [URL]

I liked the simile where Tim Robbins' character compares being a victim of sexual abuse to being bitten by a vampire--that it is always in you and that you become the monster yourself (at least his character struggled with it). I don't know where it originated, but I found some articles about Vampire Syndrome that dismissed it as a myth--dismissed the notion that there is a cycle of the abused becoming the abuser. The majority of sexual abuse victims do not go on to sexually abuse others. A lot of sexual abusers, however, do claim to have been sexually abused as children, but the actual percentage of abusers who were abused is in doubt (some sexual abusers excuse their crimes by fictionalizing victimhood). See the study, "Sexual Victimization and Sexual Delinquency: Vampire or Pinocchio Syndrome?", for more information.

Nevertheless, there is no doubt that sexual abuse victims should get help. Tim Robbins' character does show how such a tragedy can haunt a person for the rest of his or her life. It haunted the lives of his two friends as well. Despite the movie's crappy ending (I agree with you completely), it does a good job of making one think about the effects of sexual abuse, although it seems to perpetuate the myth of the vampire syndrome.

Mystic River reminds me of Affliction, also a good movie, which deals with the effects of physical abuse on people from childhood through adulthood.

#3 — October 10, 2004 @ 03:13AM — John kerry

jean penn is the only one who could play this roll since he is such a mindless punk mother fucker.

#4 — October 10, 2004 @ 16:21PM — sadi [URL]

this is a great review and i agree with so much of what you say. It's funny, i was just going to review this film today and maybe i will for my own site anyway - i've been watching it since i own the DVD. As someone else noted, the vampire image is strong because sexual predators are like soul predators - hence the term soul murderer. They suck the life out of their victim and leave them grave-risen and half dead, moving through life with this awful trauma to contend with. You can survive, but it's work. Dave Boyle, sadly, it seemed recovered enough but the trauma was always right there as if sitting on his shoulder. He could, as he said, "go off" at any moment.

Sean Penn is well cast because he always was a punk, but he is also, in my view a superb actor. The way he portrays his grief is absolutely unbelievable and strong and convincing, and that comes from some depths.

Well: you said the rest. Thanks for this and great job.

Sadi

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/17253)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments