<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Mozilla, Firefox, and Thunderbird</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:55:49 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Johnny Mickeyook</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/07/143436.php#comment-256805</link>
<description>no comments.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">256805@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:55:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by uncoolcentral</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/07/143436.php#comment-89540</link>
<description>I use the moz suite and its individual components. Contrary to your claims, I invariably notice that the mail portion of Mozilla 1.7.3 logs in to the server and otherwise retrieves mail *much* faster than T-bird 0.8. It&#039;s plain as day. I notice no rendering speed difference between Moz and FFox though.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">89540@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 9 Oct 2004 14:15:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Phillip Winn</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/07/143436.php#comment-72882</link>
<description>Thanks for the update on this, the difference is more clear to me now. 

I&#039;ll stick with Firefox, and expect bugs -- even though I have encountered none yet in 0.91. I note also that 1.0 is due to be released later this year, so that&#039;ll be nice. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">72882@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Jul 2004 15:11:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>