<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Jaws: The Revenge DVD Review</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2004 01:46:52 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by D. Gordon</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/01/012137.php#comment-81775</link>
<description>Yes, this JAWS THE REVENGE movie is a turkey. Lorrain Gary acknowledges how bad it really was and she&#039;s upset over it. She&#039;s usually a pretty lady but she looks scary in this film as she&#039;s too thin here and has a bad 1980&#039;s hairstyle.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">81775@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2004 01:46:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by D. Gordon</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/01/012137.php#comment-81774</link>
<description>Yes, this JAWS THE REVENGE movie is a turkey. Lorrain Gary acknowledges how bad it really was and she&#039;s upset over it. She&#039;s usually a pretty lady but she looks scary in this film as she&#039;s too thin here and has a bad 1980&#039;s hairstyle.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">81774@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2004 01:46:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Kent</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/01/012137.php#comment-72169</link>
<description>Terrific link Matt. Thanks!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">72169@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:56:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Matt Paprocki</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/01/012137.php#comment-72161</link>
<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.suntimes.com/ebert/ebert_reviews/1987/07/243897.html&quot;&gt;URL&lt;/a&gt;

There&#039;s Ebert&#039;s review. I&#039;d say he makes a pretty strong case by giving it no stars at all. =:)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">72161@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:26:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Matt Paprocki</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/01/012137.php#comment-72159</link>
<description>Yeah, this is the one Chris. After she says it, the shark lets out the first roar which puts almost anyone into an uncontrollable laughing fit. 

I&#039;ll have to check on the Ebert thing. I&#039;ll try to dig up his review.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">72159@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:18:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Chris Kent</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/01/012137.php#comment-72154</link>
<description>Great work Matt. Isn&#039;t this the film where Lorraine Gary stands on the bow of the boat, stares the shark down, and says something like, &quot;Come and get me you son of a bitch!&quot;

Lines just don&#039;t get any better than that!

Anyway, believe I once read that Roger Ebert stood up after the end of this film and yelled, &quot;Worse movie I&#039;ve ever seen!&quot; To me, that at the very least, makes it worth a look.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">72154@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Jul 2004 11:49:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Aaron, Duke De Mondo</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/01/012137.php#comment-72062</link>
<description>Hey, jadester, Nightmare On Elm Street 3 was a masterpiece, is what. And Bride Of Chucky also. 
Jaws - The Revenge holds a special place in my blood-pump. It&#039;s so stunningly awful that i can&#039;t help but love it. Ridiculous it may be, but it&#039;s never boring, and great fun to be around.
Great article, man.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">72062@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:16:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jadester</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/01/012137.php#comment-72010</link>
<description>strangely, when ths was on uk tv a few years ago, the ending was the original one you describe; the shark was impaled (although the roar was there)
the film was more amusing than scary, which is a shame but it&#039;s the Law Of Sequels (sorry, Diminishing Returns) in full effect: you just *know* that from the third film on, any film series will be crap.
Terminator 3
Robocop 3
Lethal Weapon 3
...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">72010@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Jul 2004 06:33:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>