<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Two-Tier Medicare...As Long As It's Not Dr. Nick.</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2004 00:03:27 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by RJ Elliott</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/25/194457.php#comment-71268</link>
<description>I work for a living. I have health insurance. I don&#039;t need no steenking Canuck drugs, mano.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">71268@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2004 00:03:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/25/194457.php#comment-71266</link>
<description>Wow, given that stunning display of wit and logic, I just give up.

But if I catch you filling a prescription here, or smoking a cigar, well, you are getting a nice ride from the Saskatoon City Police Force while dressed in one of our native costumes.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">71266@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 23:59:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by RJ Elliott</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/25/194457.php#comment-71259</link>
<description>Life expectancy is greater in the US than in Cuba. And the people are, you know, free and stuff too.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">71259@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 23:42:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by JIm Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/25/194457.php#comment-71258</link>
<description>I don&#039;t really know how preventing access to a public good is seen as helping the public, but you people do strange things and worship dark tentacled old ones. But, what prevents profit from taking priority from health-care? Oh, wait, that&#039;s how it works.

Since both Canada and Cuba have better public health-care than the USA, why don&#039;t you just change your name to start with &quot;C:&gt;&quot; and then you can also soak Gates to fund the system?
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">71258@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 23:35:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by RJ Elliott</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/25/194457.php#comment-71251</link>
<description>There will always be two (or more) tiers to health care in any country with a modicum of free market values. The rich can afford things the poor can&#039;t. Even if those things are &quot;free&quot; for everyone, the rich will be willing to pay for a slightly higher quality of that product/service.

This does not apply only to health care, by the way. It applies to anything.

Let&#039;s say a government decides to give away cars for free, to every citizen over 18. Well, of course these cars are going to be pretty basic, standard models, like a Neon or an Elantra. And the rich won&#039;t want that, so they&#039;ll go out and buy a BMW or a Benz.

Take education. In the US, everyone gets their &quot;free&quot; public school education. But it pretty much sucks. So, those who can afford it send their kids to &quot;second tier&quot; private schools.

Etc.

Only in a truly communistic nation would you be able to prevent, through state coersion, a second tier from developing. (Well, even in that case, it still might, on the black market.)

Anyway, here&#039;s hoping the Liberals get their asses handed to them.   :-]</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">71251@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2004 23:19:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>