The Senate loves 'Decency'

Written by Mark Saleski
Published June 25, 2004

Although they apparently didn't have the decency to create their own bill, instead attaching it as a rider to the year 2005 defense authorization bill. The maximum fine for incidents of 'indecency' has been increased to $275,000.

This one part of the American political system has always bothered me: the game of political chicken that is the attachment of unrelated amendments to bills. This particular bill passed 99-1 because, hey, who wants to be "Against Decency"? It's a can't-lose vote for any Senator.

What really bugs me about this 'decency' stuff is a lack of clear and consistent standards. Howard Stern is fined for speaking of a particular topic and heavy fines are levied. Oprah brings up similar material and what happens...?

Nothing.

I'd write to my senator but, honestly, I don't think it'll matter.

(First posted on Mark Is Cranky)

Mark Saleski is a writer and music obsessive based out of the Monadnock region of New Hampshire. On his best day, he hopes to channel the ghosts of Lester Bangs and Jack Kerouac. He spends the hours of 9:32PM to 1:37AM carving out music reviews and essays for Jazz.com, Blogcritics.org and other publications.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
The Senate loves 'Decency'
Published: June 25, 2004
Type:
Section: Culture
Writer: Mark Saleski
Mark Saleski's BC Writer page
Mark Saleski's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Mark Saleski
All Culture Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — June 25, 2004 @ 15:09PM — bhw [URL]

Is this an FCC fine?

#2 — June 25, 2004 @ 15:15PM — Joe [URL]

Boy, I hope C-SPAN has a 20 second delay to catch the errant F-bombs that periodically fly from the Senate floor.

#3 — June 25, 2004 @ 15:16PM — Mark Saleski [URL]

oops...yea, it's the FCC.

#4 — June 25, 2004 @ 15:53PM — Jim Carruthers [URL]

Isn't it true they had to start using the term "FCC" because they weren't legally allowed to say what they were selling was "chicken"?

#5 — June 25, 2004 @ 15:57PM — Mark Saleski [URL]

heh....yea...something like that.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/16831)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments