The Senate loves 'Decency'
Published June 25, 2004
Although they apparently didn't have the decency to create their own bill, instead attaching it as a rider to the year 2005 defense authorization bill. The maximum fine for incidents of 'indecency' has been increased to $275,000.
This one part of the American political system has always bothered me: the game of political chicken that is the attachment of unrelated amendments to bills. This particular bill passed 99-1 because, hey, who wants to be "Against Decency"? It's a can't-lose vote for any Senator.
What really bugs me about this 'decency' stuff is a lack of clear and consistent standards. Howard Stern is fined for speaking of a particular topic and heavy fines are levied. Oprah brings up similar material and what happens...?
Nothing.
I'd write to my senator but, honestly, I don't think it'll matter.
(First posted on Mark Is Cranky)
- The Senate loves 'Decency'
- Published: June 25, 2004
- Type:
- Section: Culture
- Writer: Mark Saleski
- Mark Saleski's BC Writer page
- Mark Saleski's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
Boy, I hope C-SPAN has a 20 second delay to catch the errant F-bombs that periodically fly from the Senate floor.
Isn't it true they had to start using the term "FCC" because they weren't legally allowed to say what they were selling was "chicken"?







Is this an FCC fine?