<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Ranking System</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:09:11 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by in10sity</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/20/102630.php#comment-70546</link>
<description>Thanks Eric.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70546@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:09:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/20/102630.php#comment-70522</link>
<description>Openly declaring yourself as trying to be funny is very brave and difficult - 10 should be commended.

I sneak around in stealth-humor mode.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70522@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2004 08:40:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bob A. Booey</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/20/102630.php#comment-70500</link>
<description>Booey Out! is just funny, although it&#039;s not as funny since that American Idol guy doesn&#039;t post anymore.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70500@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2004 02:38:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Natalie Davis</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/20/102630.php#comment-70456</link>
<description>Way better than Steven Wright Or Mitch Hedberg? Now, &lt;I&gt;that&#039;s&lt;/i&gt; funny.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70456@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:59:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by in10sity</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/20/102630.php#comment-70452</link>
<description>Thanks for the score of the square root of 67, Duane. I&#039;ve always strived for it.

Ah, it&#039;s fine Natalie. I am fully aware that some people find some things funny, and some will find those same things unfunny. As someone who would like to one day do something in the world of comedy, this is really the #1 thing I should know. Ok, #2. #1 is &quot;how to be funny.&quot; There are people who don&#039;t think Seinfeld was funny (the man or the show). There are people who could go out and see comedians like Steven Wright or Mitch Hedberg, and just &quot;not get them.&quot; Other people will think these same guys are geniuses. For the record, please realize that I am not comparing myself to these guys. We all I am way better. It just wouldn&#039;t be fair. Thanks for still wishing me comedy success, even though you don&#039;t find me at all comedic. =]

Bob, no need for silence. If I write something that is supposed to be funny, and you don&#039;t think it is, please tell me. If you can do it in a somewhat polite, helpful way, that&#039;d be great. My goal is to learn. If not, a simple &quot;you suck&quot; will have to do. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70452@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:51:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Natalie Davis</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/20/102630.php#comment-70448</link>
<description>Believe me, I know of what you speak. I am trying to retain my girlish figure -- all I can afford right about now is negative pi.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70448@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:31:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Duane</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/20/102630.php#comment-70445</link>
<description>Natalie, pi sounds really good right about now, but I&#039;m watching my circumference to diameter ratio. I&#039;ll just have to settle for low-fat frozen yogurt.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70445@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:19:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Natalie Davis</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/20/102630.php#comment-70441</link>
<description>How about &quot;Booey out&quot;?

Duane, low score or not, any time is a good time for pi.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70441@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:09:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bob A. Booey</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/20/102630.php#comment-70439</link>
<description>I didn&#039;t think it was funny either, but I was being polite in my silence. In fact, I didn&#039;t even know it was a joke until that &quot;I want to be a comedian&quot; thing at the bottom.

That is all.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70439@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:05:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Duane</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/20/102630.php#comment-70438</link>
<description>I&#039;ll give your article a score of square root of 67, which is a good score, though irrational. I will give Natalie&#039;s comment a pi, which is somewhat low, yet transcendental.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70438@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:04:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Natalie Davis</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/20/102630.php#comment-70437</link>
<description>i am obviously in the minority here, but i don&#039;t find this at all funny. i know he is taking what is supposed to be a comical position here, but it sounds to me like an ode to conformity.

nothing personal, in10s; you may end up being a successful comic, and i hope you do. but mileage varies, and different people find different things funny.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70437@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:54:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/20/102630.php#comment-70435</link>
<description>you&#039;re a funny guy</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70435@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:41:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by in10sity</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/20/102630.php#comment-70406</link>
<description>Nope, I haven&#039;t. I think one of the requirements for the show is that the person has actually, ya know... performed comedy. But this is a good idea.

If I ever do, I&#039;ll be the guy they introduce as &quot;You may have seen this next guy in the Et Cetera category of blogcritics.&quot;

I&#039;ll be the one in the blogcritics shirt constantly reminding the other comedians how fast the comments now post.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70406@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 17:40:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by boomcrashbaby</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/20/102630.php#comment-70364</link>
<description>in10sity, have you ever tried to get in the last comic standing house? If you did, you could mention blogcritics there and probably be forgiven for your lack of links.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70364@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 15:24:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by JR</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/20/102630.php#comment-70357</link>
<description>They do sell &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/browse.html/ref=sc_fe_c_6_0/102-1596637-7020961?%5Fencoding=UTF8&amp;node=3777211&amp;no=3760901&amp;me=ATVPDKIKX0DER&quot;&gt;scales&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70357@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:03:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tim Hall</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/20/102630.php#comment-70356</link>
<description>I vote for the DVD of &quot;This is Spinal Tap&quot; as the Amazon produce.  Unless they sell Marshall amps that go up to 11.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70356@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:52:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by in10sity</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/20/102630.php#comment-70315</link>
<description>haha! Thanks.

I know, I totally apologize for being the worst blogcritic in terms of Amazon product placement. I will do my best to try to come up with something funny about a plasma TV or an iPod.



</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70315@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:50:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/20/102630.php#comment-70304</link>
<description>I agree with Jadester et al: this one is not only funny but insightful in that &quot;pick something common up, tilt it a bit and describe what you see&quot; mode of observation. Great job, thanks!

You get a 9 for content, a 0 for Amazon product placement.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70304@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:15:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by jadester</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/20/102630.php#comment-70196</link>
<description>Is this supposed to be another of your comedy posts? because, once again, you have managed to raise a good issue.  it&#039;s pretty important too; how many magazines do you know of that rely on a scale of either 1-5 or 1-10 (even if it&#039;s in &quot;stars&quot; or some other replacement for plain numbers) for their reviews?
such a mark can be useful to readers who can&#039;t be arsed to do proper research (like reading the whole review, trying the item/software for themselves etc.) but, then again, if they can&#039;t be arsed to check something out before they buy it, doesn&#039;t that effectively make it an impulse buy? if so, surely a mark is hardly going to sway them one way or the other.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70196@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2004 14:58:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by in10sity</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/20/102630.php#comment-70195</link>
<description>Tim, ha! Nope. Actually haven&#039;t seen that in a long long time.

Thanks JR.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70195@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2004 14:57:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by JR</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/20/102630.php#comment-70187</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;This person thinks they are being clever and cool by saying something is either so good or so bad that&#039;s it&#039;s not even on the scale... but really.... they just aren&#039;t following directions.&lt;/i&gt;

Well put!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70187@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2004 12:19:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tim Hall</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/06/20/102630.php#comment-70183</link>
<description>Is this post anything to do with the fact that &quot;This is Spinal Tap&quot; was on TV late last night?

&quot;It goes up to eleven&quot;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">70183@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2004 11:54:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>